Critical Reviews vs. Flames


by Harriet Silkwood - Date: 2006-12-19 - Word Count: 701 Share This!

A negative review.

A critique should never be negative. Ever. If you get a negative critique, you can bet he is full of sour grapes. If he attacks the work in a way that is derogatory, inflammatory, and insulting - toss the review as far as you can.

Honest critiques do not say; "What are you thinking! Why would you post this piece of junk?" and then commence to show them how to write it 'the right way.' Flame throwers are puffed-up wanabe writers who can't, it doesn't matter what their credentials say.

Critical reviews are not negative flames.

If someone tells you, or if you tell someone else that something in the story isn't working, that isn't a negative flame. Advising the author to work on plot, dialogue or characters is not flaming. As long as we include the 'Why' it doesn't work for us, it is a constructive review. If we say only; this story needs work, without pointing out where and why; or without a suggestion on how to fix it - the review will not be useful. Try to give the author enough information to fully understand what you're saying. Doing anything less gives reviewers a bad name and makes it harder for the rest of us. Don't use reviewing as a means of satisfying your own ego. Yeah, reviewers have egos too.

An honest review.

If there are a lot of problems, pointing out each and every one is likely to do more harm than good. Keep in mind the feelings of the writer. Don't overwhelm with your honesty. It is extremely difficult to critique someone you don't know, since you have no idea how thick their skin is. The easiest way is to go slow and find one or two areas to comment on. Always point out strengths that you notice, so the writer knows what is working. Leave the rest of the troubles alone. You can't do it all and trying to cover everything can and does devastate a writer. If the writer is doing something well, tell them.

A constructive review.

Tell the writer why something isn't working, and give an example. If you just say; this has a lot of dangling participles and don't show them exactly what and why, you've not helped them at all. What makes a participle dangle? What makes a modifier modify? If they knew, they probably wouldn't have left it hanging. Remember, everyone isn't as up on technical terms as you are. If you're going to use them, explain them. Otherwise, keep it simple. If the review lacks clarity, it isn't constructive and you've wasted everyone's time, mainly your own.

An in-depth review

These are not for punctuation and spelling corrections, though a noted problem could be mentioned. Concentrate on the elements you know well. If you're a good judge of character, work with characters. There are other reviewers who are good at suggesting plot twists and flaws. Don't think you have to cover everything, because you can't. Remember, if you don't read and enjoy lots of fantasy, you may not understand how a fantasy story is supposed to work. Tell the reader you don't normally read the genre and comment on the areas that you do understand and feel confident to comment on. No one critiquer will see every problem, and every critiquer is better at something.

An editing review.

This should be done at the last stage of the story. All the revising has been done and it's ready to send out. The nit-picking punctuation problems will be fixed, along with the typos and small grammar errors. A good story that has been accepted for publishing, will not be turned away because of a few errors left in here. Copy editors of the publishing house will check for those. If there were too many, the work would not have been accepted in the first place.

Subjective and Objective.

Each author must gauge for himself if the feedback has merit. Most of it will be the subjective opinion of the reviewer. What is not subjective is spelling, grammar, (with a few exceptions) and punctuation. There are general rules that are not opinion. Learning to distinguish one from the other goes along with the journey of learning to write well.


Related Tags: fiction, new writers, opinion, characters, plots, tough reviews, junk writers, flame throwers

Harriet is an author on http://www.Writing.Com which is a site for Creative Writing.Her portfolio can be found at http://www.Writing.Com/authors/storytime so stop by and read for a while. She specializes in reading and reviewing new writers.

Your Article Search Directory : Find in Articles

© The article above is copyrighted by it's author. You're allowed to distribute this work according to the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs license.
 

Recent articles in this category:



Most viewed articles in this category:


  • Don't Put Off Writing that Book! by Linden Gross
    If writing that book you've always had in mind tops your list of resolutions or regrets, hiring a wr
  • How To Write A Better Press Release by Brian Konradt
    A press release is the most effective way to generate free publicity for your business or organizati
  • Writing on the Hoof by Rick Chapo
    Finding inspiration when you are writing is often a haphazard affair. When you are physically ready
  • Focus On Nigeria by Andrew Sandon
    Focus on Nigeria Nigеria is a natural gas and oil rich country that is bordеrеd b
  • How to Write Great Dialogue in Your Book by Steve Manning
    Dialogue isn't so much read as it is heard by the reader. The eyes see the words on the page, the b
  • Women SUV Driver from www.thefrap.com by Eric Schmidt
    Why do so many women drive around in the oversized SUV's, the Tahoe, Excursion, Escalade
  • How To Write Good Articles by Jonathan White
    As a writer you may be ready to cash in on the need for web content. There is a lot of money that c
  • NEWS FLASH: Technical Communicator Saves World by Peggy Bennett
    I had a boss several years ago who was amused by my earnest and relentless preaching about the impor
  • Writers Resources by Josh Riverside
    Writers use certain inherent talents to come up with their pieces of writing. However, they do need
  • Popular Articles by Roel Sundiam
    Articles are those that are available in plenty these days in the internet. The articles are written