Intellectual Property Law - Copyright Law - Copyright Infringement - Computer Software
At the material time the defendants had for a number of years been the dominant supplier in that market. In April 2001, the claimant and the defendants entered into an outsourcing agreement under which the claimant carried out work for the defendants, work which included a review of a module in the defendants' Goal software. In order to carry out that work, the claimant was provided with three modules of the defendant's Goal software.
In the course of its business the claimant supplied a product known as Acuo Software, a product which had been developed over a period between 2 July 2001 and August 2002. The development of Acuo Software was in response to an approach from CMI, a well known pension provider.
In October 2001, the outsourcing agreement between the claimant and the defendants came to an end. Apparently, the defendants had learned that the claimant had been awarded the CMI contract, for which the defendants had made an unsuccessful bid, and that the claimant intended to bid for a different contract with H (the parent company of CMI) in direct competition with the defendants.
The defendants asked for the return of the three modules of Goal software. The claimant claimed to have complied with this request. In October 2002, the defendants wrote to the claimant to:
"Seek confirmation of the provenance of the software you have developed in order to compete with [the defendants]"
The defendants also sought confirmation that the claimant had not undertaken any copying of the defendants' Goal software or solutions. The claimant replied, confirming that it had not copied the defendants' software, and offered to make voluntary disclosure (to a mutually agreeable third party) of material that would confirm that there had been no copyright infringement.
The parties agreed to the identity of the experts to be instructed, and terms of reference on the basis of which they should be asked to act. However, the matter did not progress. Eventually, in December 2004, the claimant commenced proceedings seeking a declaration of non-infringement of copyright. It was directed that an expert's report be obtained, however the parties failed to comply with that direction. The judge refused to grant the relief sought, saying that she had been asked to make a declaration that software, which she had not yet seen, did not infringe any copyright in another software product which she had also not yet seen. She went on to hold that copyright had not yet been demonstrated with regard to such software.
The claimant appealed. It submitted on appeal:
§ That the judge was wrong to find that the claimant had failed to establish on the balance of probabilities that it did not copy the defendant's source code in creating the Acuo Software;
§ That the judge had erred in finding that there was no utility in making a declaration even if there had been no copying; and
§ That her finding that she would have exercised her discretion against granting a declaration even if she had found in its favour on the issue of non-infringement was perverse.
The appeal would be dismissed.
The claimant had not shown that the judge was wrong in finding that it had failed to establish on the balance of probabilities that it had not copied the defendants' source code in creating the Acuo Software. Therefore, the other two grounds did not arise.
It is interesting to note that a judge should be slow to allow proceedings of this nature to be brought to trial in circumstances where the parties have chosen (for tactical and forensic reasons) to disregard directions already given for the provision of the expert assistance needed if the court is to decide the real question in dispute.
If you require further information contact us at enquiries@rtcoopers.com
Visit http://www.rtcoopersiplaw.com or http://www.rtcoopers.com/practice_intellectualproperty.php
© RT COOPERS, 2007. This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. It is intended only to highlight general issues. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to particular circumstances.
Related Tags: copyright, copyright law, copyright infringement, copyright lawyers, copyright solicitors
Intellectual property law firm advising on patents, Patent attorneys, Patent Lawyers, Copyright, designs, Copyright law, know-how, Patent Licensing, Patent Infringement, trade marks, trademarks, trademark searches, trademark infringement, Intellectual Property Law, IP lawyers, IP solicitors, copyright lawyers, IP lawyers, IP law Firm, IP valuations IP solicitors freedom to operate copyright lawyers, patent solicitors, branding, intellectual property lawyers, intellectual property solicitors, IP law firm, solicitors in Docklands, solicitors in Wapping, pharmaceutical lawyers, regulatory lawyers, regulatory solicitors, pharmaceutical solicitors
Your Article Search Directory : Find in ArticlesRecent articles in this category:
- A Los Angeles and Palm Springs California Modeling Lawyer Looks at Modeling Contracts and Advises How Models Can Protect Themselves
Models from Los Angeles to New York have a number of common questions when they first enter the mod - Palm Springs, Newport Beach and Malibu California Publicity and Privacy Rights Lawyer on the Right to Control the Use of Your Image and Likeness
Whether you are a star in the California entertainment industry in Hollywood, Malibu, Los Angeles, - A La Jolla, Irvine, Los Angeles and San Diego Biotechnology Attorney's View of What Biotechnology Can Do for Mankind
If you work in any of the high tech or university medical research areas of Southern California suc - La Quinta, Garden Grove and Corona Del Mar California Copyright Lawyer Looks at Copyright Infringements in Conversations
No matter where you live or try to make a living in Southern California, from Westminster and Missi - Palm Desert, San Diego and Orange County California Intellectual Property Attorney Explains the Worldwide Intellectual Property System
If you are an inventor, a writer, a musician or a designer, it doesn't matter if you live in Murrie - An Orange County, Fullerton and Riverside California Trademark Lawyer's Humorous Take on Trademark Infringement
To a great many people in Southern California, the law regarding infringement of trademarks, copyri - The Marketing of Candidates Using Trademarks and Campaign Slogans in California and the U.s
No matter where you live in America, whether it is in Orange County, California, Los Angeles, CA, S - Trademark of Slogans and Phrases by Palm Springs, San Diego and Orange County California Trademark Lawyers
Clients who want to trademark a slogan or phrase for their products can come from Santa Ana, Califo - Small Article- Poverty
                 Poverty.         Most of the people in most of the cou - Protecting Your Interests: Using Competitive Intelligence Gathering Techniques at Tradeshows to Safeguard Your Bottom Line
"This looks absolutely amazing!" The attendee was smiling, eyes bright, a wide grin. "If this is
Most viewed articles in this category:
- 5 Ways to Protect Your Idea-for Less than $30
For all of the people out there who can't afford the $5,000 for a patent this book is for you. Even - Selecting Business Names and Intellectual Property Law
Whether a software license agreement is properly constructed for a transaction depends on a range of - Protect Your Creativity
As an entrepreneur, you are undoubtedly blessed with the ability to come up with new ideas for produ - Protecting Your Intellectual Property (IP)
Intellectual Property (IP), in the literal sense, refers to the property of one's intellect or mind. - How "Work For Hire" Laws Protect You When You Hire a Ghostwriter
Some people are interested in jumping on the article marketing bandwagon but lack either the time or - Digital Millennium Copyright Act DMCA Redefined - Steps to Keep Your Content and Intellectual Proper
As Viacom prepares to square off against Google in its lawsuit over the use of copyrighted material - The Difference Between Trade Secrets And Trademarks
Some people get confused between trade secrets and trademarks. A trademark is something that is publ - Intellectual Property - Copyright Infringement - Trade Mark Infringement
The case of KK Sony Computer Entertainment and Another v Pacific Game Technology (Holding) Ltd [2006 - Understanding Patent Database Behavior For Better Patent Search
Extracting information from huge datasets, based on keyword search is actually a challenging job. Pa - The Intellectual Property Audit - Finding What You Have (Part II of V)
One traditional definition of an intellectual property audit is "a cataloging of a organization's in