Why Bankers Don't Deserve Bonuses!
- Date: 2009-12-27 - Word Count: 495
Share This!
So just who is responsible for this one; who is responsible for creating so much national and international debt? Some would say it hit us as far back as 2007 but statistics show that it was more likely to be early 2008. And the bankers are being blamed - yes, the very people who receive millions each year in extortionate bonuses whilst the rest of us suffer through an economic downturn.
Despite the recession, top level bankers have continued to receive millions of pounds in bonuses over the past year. Now most of us get a bonus at work if the company performs well or if we perform well. Banks and bankers have done neither and yet they have still been allowed to cream off ludicrous amounts of money and take it as a god-given right to an incentive just because of the position they hold; something that does not sit well with the rest of the world when they consider the banks responsible in the first place for the start of the recession.
Some would argue that the bankers, who made irresponsible decisions over public borrowing, caused the collapse of the economy and should be subject to the same reviews as anyone else in their own jobs. If they underperform, they get axed; simple as that. Lending more money that is actually viable to do so, and causing the onset of more and more home repossessions, leaving people stranded and financially hard-up is hardly a responsible way to conduct any business.
The Governments in the US and the UK are now clamping down on the bankers' bonuses and making it clear that they do not support huge incentives for people who are not capable of doing their jobs properly. Some politicians are obviously more in favour of this than others but it is a step in the right direction.
Those at the top in the banking industry are, in effect, taking risks with other people's money and they have proved that they can get it very badly wrong! And who suffers? Well it's not them by the sound of things. If we, the public, are to suffer, then why should a banker at the top of his ivory tower receive such a large payout? What gives them the right to suggest that they are worthy of this money?
There has been a suggestion that the representatives of the banks should decide on who gets a bonus at the banks. So this could mean the general public also getting a say. Power to the people and all that! There has also been talk of paying back some of last year's bonuses which won't go down too well with Mr HBOS.
Hey, if the top guys and gals at the banks have consciences and morals, then maybe they'll give back that money and spread it around the rest of us. Or maybe we'll just have to wait until the recession is over and count our blessings that we made it.
Despite the recession, top level bankers have continued to receive millions of pounds in bonuses over the past year. Now most of us get a bonus at work if the company performs well or if we perform well. Banks and bankers have done neither and yet they have still been allowed to cream off ludicrous amounts of money and take it as a god-given right to an incentive just because of the position they hold; something that does not sit well with the rest of the world when they consider the banks responsible in the first place for the start of the recession.
Some would argue that the bankers, who made irresponsible decisions over public borrowing, caused the collapse of the economy and should be subject to the same reviews as anyone else in their own jobs. If they underperform, they get axed; simple as that. Lending more money that is actually viable to do so, and causing the onset of more and more home repossessions, leaving people stranded and financially hard-up is hardly a responsible way to conduct any business.
The Governments in the US and the UK are now clamping down on the bankers' bonuses and making it clear that they do not support huge incentives for people who are not capable of doing their jobs properly. Some politicians are obviously more in favour of this than others but it is a step in the right direction.
Those at the top in the banking industry are, in effect, taking risks with other people's money and they have proved that they can get it very badly wrong! And who suffers? Well it's not them by the sound of things. If we, the public, are to suffer, then why should a banker at the top of his ivory tower receive such a large payout? What gives them the right to suggest that they are worthy of this money?
There has been a suggestion that the representatives of the banks should decide on who gets a bonus at the banks. So this could mean the general public also getting a say. Power to the people and all that! There has also been talk of paying back some of last year's bonuses which won't go down too well with Mr HBOS.
Hey, if the top guys and gals at the banks have consciences and morals, then maybe they'll give back that money and spread it around the rest of us. Or maybe we'll just have to wait until the recession is over and count our blessings that we made it.
Related Tags: debt, credit, bank, mortgages, banks, government, financial, economy, lenders, toxic, lending, administration, bankers, economic, downturn, crunch
Your Article Search Directory : Find in Articles
Recent articles in this category:
- When Did The Term "racist" Turn Into A Political Tactic?
I had always thought that being a racist was a bad thing. The dictionary defines a racist as someone - Best Choice For You And Me - Palin, Tea And The Gop
Tea Party backed Christine O'Donnell's spectacular win in Delaware combined with others around the n - The International Response To Plastic Bags
Americans overwhelmingly choose plastic. Per year they use around 90 million plastic versus 5 billio - Using Comparative Effectiveness Research To Examine And Improve Health Care Reform
Our understanding of the effectiveness of healthcare interventions continues to grow - in particular - Landslides' Avalanche Of Mud.
When China observed a day of mourning on 15th August 2010 for the victims of the previous week's dea - The Fed's Role In Crisis And Recovery
Despite its apolitical mandate, the Federal Reserve remains one of the most politically sensitive in - Relocation Of 330,000 Residents Begins In Central China
In the country's largest relocation program since the Three Gorges Dam, China has ordered over 330,0 - China Launches Global English News Channel
The Chinese government owned news agency - Xinhua has started broadcasting events happening in China - After Hitting Record Lows Mortgage Rates Fall Again
The 30 year rate dropped this week from 4.69 to 4.58. This is quite a large drop for a week. What ma - U.n. Report: India And China Massively Improving Slums
China and India have improved the lives of more slum dwellers than any other country, the United Nat
Most viewed articles in this category:
- Campaign Time Again
Politicians are everywhere once more. They're on television, radio, billboards, the Internet and on - Salman Rushdie The Sensitive Prophet And Juma Gul
Between Danish cartoons and Rushdie's "Satanic Verses" that have raised the ire of Muslims worldwide - The Fight For La'au Point
There is a battle between the largest private landowner of Moloka'i (the Moloka'i Ranch) and the nat - Is Charles, The Prince Of Wales, Fit To Be King?
Charles Philip Arthur George Windsor named at his birth on the 14th of November 1948. Charles, the e - The Web And The 2008 Presidential Race
A lot of people have expressed that there is too much buzz on the upcoming 2008 presidential race. T - The Theory Of Globalization And Its Analysis
There has been considerable academic debate concerning the emergence and meaning of globalisation wi - High Fives To The Modern Day Colonists
The colonists from the 1700's would be giving the modern day colonists high fives for their spirit a - Isn't Your Job Mindset Suffocating You, Your Dreams, And Your Goals?
The chains of the corporate mindset holds people back from stepping forward and completely creating - Book On Bihar
There is one thing that I really despise - is the fact that people do raise eyebrows when you utter - End Of The World 12 21 2012
Can you imagine in 999 A.D. how many predictions that the world would come to an end there might be?