U. S. Constitution Fails All 3 Tests For A Christian Government
- Date: 2008-11-21 - Word Count: 531
Share This!
Patrick Henry is usually lumped in with other founders like James Madison, but Henry never was reconciled to the U. S. Constitution. "Discipling the Nations -- The Government Upon His Shoulder" tells the story.
The book relates how there was no Christian agreement on the U. S. Constitution at the time of the ratification debates and Patrick Henry became the Constitution's strongest critic. Earlier Henry had rejected his invitation to the Constitutional Convention with the acerbic, "I smelt a rat."
Showdown in Virginia
The Virginia Ratifying convention was key to the ratification debates. Had the proposed U. S. Constitution failed in Virginia -- the home of Madison, Washington, and Jefferson -- it would have been dealt a mortal blow. It was a classic showdown between Federalists led by James Madison and Anti-Federalists headed by Patrick Henry. Going in to the convention Anti-Federalists trailed Federalists by more than 2 to 1. But Henry was so effective in debate that 23 days later the U. S. Constitution barely squeeked through with a mere eight-vote margin.
Henry was magnificent in debate, one speech lasting a full 7 hours. He delivered as many as 3 speeches on each of several days in a powerful display of rhetoric. James Madison confessed that he could speak for an hour and Henry would raise an eyebrow and undo everything he said in a split second.
Henry characterized the U. S. Constitution as "a revolution more radical than that which separated us from Great Britain." In particular, he objected to making "We the People" the sovereign source of governing authority.
Constitution has 'Wall of Separation'
Despite Evangelical Protests
Most Evangelical historians go to great lengths to show that Thomas Jefferson's "wall of separation" phrase does not appear in the U. S. Constitution. That is quite true.
However, the concept is there nonetheless, tucked away in a little known provision of Article VI. "Discipling the Nations" points to the culprit in Article VI, Section 3: "No religious test shall ever be required for any office or public trust under these United States."
As the story unfolds, we learn that a bon-a-fide Christian nation will be marked by three traits:
1) It will commit itself to the Bible as the highest law of the land,
2) It will pass laws against murder, theft, adultery and other crimes based specifically on the Bible, and
3) It will require government officers to swear on oath to uphold those laws.
The U. S. Constitution fails all three tests, in particular at point 3) where it forbids any oath requiring the officeholder to govern by the Bible. In addition, it draws its authority exclusively from the majority vote of "we the people" (not God) and declares itself (not the Bible) to be the supreme law of the land. Taken together these constitute a formidable wall of separation between God and State.
For these and other reasons Patrick Henry declared "I smelt a rat," when asked why he turned down his summons to the Constitutional Convention. In spite of this, contemporary Christian historians still declare the U. S. Constitution to be a Christian document. They marshal such weighty evidence as the date including the phrase "year of our Lord." But the 3 failed tests are decisive.
The book relates how there was no Christian agreement on the U. S. Constitution at the time of the ratification debates and Patrick Henry became the Constitution's strongest critic. Earlier Henry had rejected his invitation to the Constitutional Convention with the acerbic, "I smelt a rat."
Showdown in Virginia
The Virginia Ratifying convention was key to the ratification debates. Had the proposed U. S. Constitution failed in Virginia -- the home of Madison, Washington, and Jefferson -- it would have been dealt a mortal blow. It was a classic showdown between Federalists led by James Madison and Anti-Federalists headed by Patrick Henry. Going in to the convention Anti-Federalists trailed Federalists by more than 2 to 1. But Henry was so effective in debate that 23 days later the U. S. Constitution barely squeeked through with a mere eight-vote margin.
Henry was magnificent in debate, one speech lasting a full 7 hours. He delivered as many as 3 speeches on each of several days in a powerful display of rhetoric. James Madison confessed that he could speak for an hour and Henry would raise an eyebrow and undo everything he said in a split second.
Henry characterized the U. S. Constitution as "a revolution more radical than that which separated us from Great Britain." In particular, he objected to making "We the People" the sovereign source of governing authority.
Constitution has 'Wall of Separation'
Despite Evangelical Protests
Most Evangelical historians go to great lengths to show that Thomas Jefferson's "wall of separation" phrase does not appear in the U. S. Constitution. That is quite true.
However, the concept is there nonetheless, tucked away in a little known provision of Article VI. "Discipling the Nations" points to the culprit in Article VI, Section 3: "No religious test shall ever be required for any office or public trust under these United States."
As the story unfolds, we learn that a bon-a-fide Christian nation will be marked by three traits:
1) It will commit itself to the Bible as the highest law of the land,
2) It will pass laws against murder, theft, adultery and other crimes based specifically on the Bible, and
3) It will require government officers to swear on oath to uphold those laws.
The U. S. Constitution fails all three tests, in particular at point 3) where it forbids any oath requiring the officeholder to govern by the Bible. In addition, it draws its authority exclusively from the majority vote of "we the people" (not God) and declares itself (not the Bible) to be the supreme law of the land. Taken together these constitute a formidable wall of separation between God and State.
For these and other reasons Patrick Henry declared "I smelt a rat," when asked why he turned down his summons to the Constitutional Convention. In spite of this, contemporary Christian historians still declare the U. S. Constitution to be a Christian document. They marshal such weighty evidence as the date including the phrase "year of our Lord." But the 3 failed tests are decisive.
Related Tags: u s constitution, patrick henry, anti-federalist
For more information about the anti-Christian features of the U.S. Constitution visit www.america-betrayed-1787.com/us-constitution.html Dennis Woods is webmaster and also a political pollster and fundraiser in Oregon, using the Dog Catcher Campaign Strategy: www.america-betrayed-1787/gary-north.html Your Article Search Directory : Find in Articles
Recent articles in this category:
- Effective Online Teaching Aids
LearningTRACS is one of the few "cloud-based" online teaching aids that present text and images as a - Ending Acid Reflux Naturally
Heartburn or acid reflux has been causing complications for people for a long time, however there se - Home Schooling And Discipline
When the child stays at home all day, and mommy is the teacher, there are certain issues of discipli - Distance Education Benefits
Distance edication is a good way to hold track with the long-term goals when fulfilling the short-te - Homeschooling Your Child With A Learning Disability
Making the decision to home school your child is not the easiest decision at the best of times, but - Finding Your Daily Motivation: Homeschooling Challenge
As with any job or task, we often find ourselves becoming complacent and homeschooling your child is - Improve Your Math Ability With Subliminal Messages
Working with even basic math problems can be troubling for some people, and this condition will onl - Dvd On U. S. Constitution Exposes The 3 Signs Of Historical Revisionism Among Christians
"Ismellarat -- An Anti-Federalist Interpretation of American History"is unique as an evangelical vid - World Of Books- India Today Book Club
Comic books have been prominent for many years. These are the only books which have got much saleabl - The Benefits Of Home Learning
The Prime Minister has said that the future of British businesses will rely on a skilled workforce.
Most viewed articles in this category:
- What Are Really the Best Toys for Your Children to Play With
Christmas MorningEyes wide and beaming with ear-to-ear smiles, a two year old boy and his five year - Unschooling - What Is It
Unschooling is a method of learning that is not set in stone. In fact, it tends to mean different th - Math Word Problem Solving Tips From An Experienced Math Tutor
As a teacher and math tutor, I have seen many students struggle with solving word problems. Who of u - Guide To Homeschooling: How To Teach Unfamiliar Subjects
It is inevitable that as your child advances to a higher homeschooling level, you encounter subjects - Benefits of Home Schooling To Both Parents And Children
Parents choose home schooling for many different reasons. Some families want to build up their famil - How Does Homeschooling Affect College Acceptance
Opponents of homeschooling argue the fact that children who are homeschooled have a much more diffic - Lesson Planning for the Unorganized Mom
You may think that because you are unorganized you'll be facing a next to impossible task, when it c - Multi-Age Home Schooling - Starting And Practicing Algebra
As I'm sure you know algebra and mathematics in general, needs a lot of practice if your child/pupil - What Exactly Is Homeschooling
Homeschooling is really quite simple. It's a process where parents have accepted the responsibility - Homeschool Art Project Ideas
One of the greatest aspects about homeschooling your children is the fact that you can be as creativ