Net Neutrality Act Once Again on the Agenda
The impetus for the bill started back in 2005, when broadband network executives began discussing the possibility of charging companies that use a high percentage of bandwidth. Most notably, in an interview with a Business Week, SBC chairman Ed Whitacre Jr (now AT&T CEO) stated: "How do you think they're going to get to customers? Through a broadband pipe. Cable companies have them. We have them. Now what they would like to do is use my pipes free, but I ain't going to let them do that because we have spent this capital and we have to have a return on it. So there's going to have to be some mechanism for these people who use these pipes to pay for the portion they're using. Why should they be allowed to use my pipes?"
Whitacre went on to say, "The Internet can't be free in that sense, because we and the cable companies have made an investment and for a Google or Yahoo! or Vonage or anybody to expect to use these pipes free is nuts!"
What's nuts is that he actually said that. What followed was a grass roots uprising from Internet companies, consumer groups, and bloggers, concerned about broadband service providers having the ability to determine what applications and services are provided to the Internet consumer. Conceivably, even searches performed on the Internet could lead directly to a site owned by the provider.
Broadband service providers already charge consumers up to $60 a month for Internet service, and now want to turn around and charge companies like Google, Yahoo, YouTube and Vonage for their bandwidth usage. What you see on the Internet would be totally under the influence of your broadband service provider - the so called Gatekeeper, and a once free and unfettered Internet would evolve into a scripted and censored interactive television network.
And what about up and coming technologies such as Voice over IP telephony? If you don't pay, you don't play! The pure play VoIP providers like Vonage, Packet8 and Skype offer some of the lowest rates in the history of the Telecommunications industry. Wouldn't AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast just love to tax these companies right out of business! These big boys also offer VoIP phone service, but prefer to start at $40 calling plans rather than the pure plays $10-$20 plans. At 3 million and growing, consumers are realizing the value of Internet Telephony. Let the Gatekeepers charge for the pipe, and the little guys are sure to suffer, as will the consumer in the form of higher prices.
The Gatekeepers complain that they built the network, and they should be able to recoup their investment. Fine, but does that mean they should be able to shape the face of the Internet? Companies like AT&T need to find another way. The Internet was and is a place where the little guy has as good a chance as any to make it big. Google, YouTube, Skype and Vonage all started small, and are now leaders in their Internet industry.
The Net Neutrality act would prohibit service providers from blocking or degrading access to Internet content and services. They also could not prevent consumers from connecting external devices to their network, with the exception of devices posing a threat to security. The prioritization of types of content, applications, or services would be allowed under the condition that it is done free of charge, and that it is done for all types of that particular content. For example, the prioritization of packets to insure Quality of Service for Voice over IP must be done for all VoIP providers free of charge to them.
Another interesting proposal in the bill would require that broadband companies offer standalone broadband service, to be enforced by the FCC. A recent ruling by the FCC in Atlanta decried that Bell South (now AT&T), was not obliged to unbundle its DSL broadband service from a traditional telephone line. This would open up the opportunity for consumers to acquire a DSL broadband connection without having to pay for traditional phone service.
Whitacre and company (AT&T) recently agreed to adopt the spirit of net neutrality for a period of 2 years so that they could get approval from the FCC to merge with Bell South. It worked! Bell South and Cingular Wireless will soon be known, once again, as AT&T.
Senator Dorgan maintains that the Internet was a place where anyone with a good idea could create a business. "The marketplace picked winners and losers, not some central gatekeeper," said the Senator. "That freedom--the very core of what makes the Internet what it is today--must be preserved."
With a new sheriff in town, maybe, just maybe it will be.
Related Tags: internet, voip, youtube, broadband, net neutrality, vonage
Author Michael Talbert is a certified systems engineer and web designer with over 7 years experience in the industry. For more information on Voice over IP Telephony, visit the website VoIP-Facts.net, or the VoIP Blog for up to date industry news and commentary.
Your Article Search Directory : Find in ArticlesRecent articles in this category:
- Troubling New"spam" to Cell Phones Discovered
Troubling new"Spam" to Cell Phones Discovered In a day and age when spam is rampant on the interne - Sex Offenders - Keep Your Family Protected From Sex Offenders
As a parent, it is your responsibility to protect your family from any type of harm. Most especiall - Criminal Defense Attorney
You've seen them on TV in their black coats; the formidable forces of law, the strong and intense - Critical Analysis of Cyber Law
Critical Analysis of Information Technology Act, 2000 Till year 2000, India did not have any legis - Finding a Good Lawyer Referral
Perform An Online Attorney Search When You Need To lawyer referralHere is a common scenario: You ar - Usa Can Copy All You Have on Your Laptop
USA can copy all you have on your Laptop.American authorities has given airport security control mor - Best And Top New York Immigration Lawyer Of NY?
The term Immigration Lawyer is another very common term people are becoming aware of. But most of th - Domain Name Theft
Are you losing visitors to your domain? Are your search engine rankings still yours?Other people mi - Domain Name Dispute, What To Expect after You've Won
You file a UDRP complaint under ICANN and a panel has ordered a transfer of the stolen domain name. - Is Your Spouse Lying?
You may have noticed some unusual behavior from your significant other such as spending a lot of tim
Most viewed articles in this category:
- Protecting your Website's Content: Just Don't Bother
The internet is the best place if you want to steal content. It makes it really easy to copy any inf - Malaysian Internet Marketer; The Constraints On Internet Transaction
The Problems;There is always an obstacle for everyone when dealing with internet transaction, Malays - A New Music Copyright Lawsuit Against YouTube
In the middle of November, Universal Music filed an extensive copyright lawsuit against YouTube, not - How To Use Metadata As An Examination Tool
In today's computer dependent world, the zealous advocate must be able to navigate his way through - Viacom Sues Google
Viacom, a media company, has recently sued Google for $1 billion, for the copyright infringement on - A Short Synopsis Of Cybercrime
To many involved in criminal dense, cyber crime is the bane of the 21st Century. It accounts for mi - Internet Law in 2007
As we start off the 2007 year, many in the web community probably have questions about what developm - Are We Able to Completely Stop Software Piracy
Software piracy is the illegal reproduction and distribution of software applications, whether for b - Defamation and Slander on the Internet
As social networking sites and internet blogs continue to increase in both popularity and use, the o - Anti-Cyber Squatting Consumer Protection Act Update
Our law firm receives a lot of calls from people and companies who are being threatened with an Anti