Juveniles Tried As Adults
- Date: 2009-07-15 - Word Count: 848
Share This!
The superior court shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the trial of any child 13 to 17 years of age who is alleged to have committed any of the following offenses:
(1) Murder;
(2) Voluntary Manslaughter;
(3) Rape;
(4) Aggravated sodomy;
(5) Aggravated child molestation;
(6) Aggravated sexual battery; or
(7) Armed robbery if committed with a firearm.
O.C.G.A. § 15-11-28(b)(2)(A).
Because a child accused of committing the above crimes must be tried as an adult, early consultation with a lawyer is crucial. There are possible ways to reduce the charges and get the case sent to juvenile court where the child will be treated more fairly. A lawyer will have to work closely with the judge and district attorney to transfer a case.
There is increasing research and study into the psychology of children and teen minds and how charging and punishment in adult court does not fairly or effectively treat delinquent behavior. The Department of Justice has compiled these studies concluding that children are likely not deterred by the threat of adult prosecution and recidivism is actually worse for those kids exposed to adult court and prison. See Juvenile Justice Bulletin, OJJDP, August 2008 available at www.ojp.usdoj.gov. Such research and scholarship can be useful in negotiating with the district attorney in your case.
If a lawyer does not obtain a transfer from either the district attorney or the judge, it is almost impossible to appeal the issue. In Martin v. State, 256 Ga. App. 527 (2002), the Court of Appeals stressed that the judge is under no duty to transfer a case or investigate whether to transfer.
It is equally important to fight transfer to superior court. The juvenile court can transfer a case to superior court if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the child committed the delinquent act alleged; that the child is not mentally retarded or mentally ill; that the interests of the child and the community require the transfer be made; and that the child was at least 15 years of age at the time of the alleged delinquent conduct. O.C.G.A. § 15-11-30.2.
School Searches & Interrogations
Increasingly, children are being searched and interrogated while at school. These actions by school officials and police at school often lead not only to school punishment, but also charges in juvenile court or even adult charges in superior court. Because of the increasing stakes, scrutiny and oversight of the searches and interrogations that are taking place in schools are crucial to the criminal defense of a child. In these circumstances, a motion to suppress a child's school statements or evidence found through a search is often the first line
In the Interest of T.A.G., 292 Ga. App. 48 (2008)
T.A.G. was implicated in a robbery of two boys at school, and an assistant principal took him to his office to question him. T.A.G. admitted taking money from one of the kids, but not from the other. In a second interview, T.A.G. admitted taking money from the second kid as well.
A school resource officer (a police officer assigned to the school) was present at the second interview. The officer did not ask questions and was there for "safety purposes." The principal questioned the student and asked the officer if the student could be charged with a crime, the officer answered that he could be charged with robbery.
The trial court refused to suppress the first statement finding that there was no police involvement. The court granted the motion as to the second statement because a police officer was involved. The court found that the police were trying to usurp the student's Miranda rights by having the school official ask all the questions but then using the statements as evidence against the child.
The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision citing State v. Young, 234 Ga. 488 (1975). In Young, the Georgia Supreme Court held that there are three types of people: (1) private individuals; (2) government agents whose conduct constitutes state action; and (3) police who are subject to the Fourth Amendment and the exclusionary rule.
School officials are considered type 2 people. When they violate the Fourth Amendment, they are subject to a civil damages claim, but the violation does not result in the exclusion of the evidence. When school officials get police involved, however, both Miranda and the Fourth Amendment apply.
State v. K.L.M., 278 Ga. App. 219 (2006)
A student overheard that K.L.M. was arranging to sell drugs during school, and told the principal. The principal called a public safety officer for assistance. When questioned, K. refuses to speak. The principal said, "Search him!" and the officer searched K and found marijuana.
The trial court granted K's motion to suppress, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. A school official could have gotten away with the search, but the officer could not. The fact that the officer was acting at the behest of the principal did not excuse him from the requirement that he have probable cause to search a subject.
It is imperative to fight the evidence and charges against children who are in a vulnerable position to be abused by the system. A lawyer who is knowledgeable of the available remedies is paramount to a desirable result.
(1) Murder;
(2) Voluntary Manslaughter;
(3) Rape;
(4) Aggravated sodomy;
(5) Aggravated child molestation;
(6) Aggravated sexual battery; or
(7) Armed robbery if committed with a firearm.
O.C.G.A. § 15-11-28(b)(2)(A).
Because a child accused of committing the above crimes must be tried as an adult, early consultation with a lawyer is crucial. There are possible ways to reduce the charges and get the case sent to juvenile court where the child will be treated more fairly. A lawyer will have to work closely with the judge and district attorney to transfer a case.
There is increasing research and study into the psychology of children and teen minds and how charging and punishment in adult court does not fairly or effectively treat delinquent behavior. The Department of Justice has compiled these studies concluding that children are likely not deterred by the threat of adult prosecution and recidivism is actually worse for those kids exposed to adult court and prison. See Juvenile Justice Bulletin, OJJDP, August 2008 available at www.ojp.usdoj.gov. Such research and scholarship can be useful in negotiating with the district attorney in your case.
If a lawyer does not obtain a transfer from either the district attorney or the judge, it is almost impossible to appeal the issue. In Martin v. State, 256 Ga. App. 527 (2002), the Court of Appeals stressed that the judge is under no duty to transfer a case or investigate whether to transfer.
It is equally important to fight transfer to superior court. The juvenile court can transfer a case to superior court if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the child committed the delinquent act alleged; that the child is not mentally retarded or mentally ill; that the interests of the child and the community require the transfer be made; and that the child was at least 15 years of age at the time of the alleged delinquent conduct. O.C.G.A. § 15-11-30.2.
School Searches & Interrogations
Increasingly, children are being searched and interrogated while at school. These actions by school officials and police at school often lead not only to school punishment, but also charges in juvenile court or even adult charges in superior court. Because of the increasing stakes, scrutiny and oversight of the searches and interrogations that are taking place in schools are crucial to the criminal defense of a child. In these circumstances, a motion to suppress a child's school statements or evidence found through a search is often the first line
In the Interest of T.A.G., 292 Ga. App. 48 (2008)
T.A.G. was implicated in a robbery of two boys at school, and an assistant principal took him to his office to question him. T.A.G. admitted taking money from one of the kids, but not from the other. In a second interview, T.A.G. admitted taking money from the second kid as well.
A school resource officer (a police officer assigned to the school) was present at the second interview. The officer did not ask questions and was there for "safety purposes." The principal questioned the student and asked the officer if the student could be charged with a crime, the officer answered that he could be charged with robbery.
The trial court refused to suppress the first statement finding that there was no police involvement. The court granted the motion as to the second statement because a police officer was involved. The court found that the police were trying to usurp the student's Miranda rights by having the school official ask all the questions but then using the statements as evidence against the child.
The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision citing State v. Young, 234 Ga. 488 (1975). In Young, the Georgia Supreme Court held that there are three types of people: (1) private individuals; (2) government agents whose conduct constitutes state action; and (3) police who are subject to the Fourth Amendment and the exclusionary rule.
School officials are considered type 2 people. When they violate the Fourth Amendment, they are subject to a civil damages claim, but the violation does not result in the exclusion of the evidence. When school officials get police involved, however, both Miranda and the Fourth Amendment apply.
State v. K.L.M., 278 Ga. App. 219 (2006)
A student overheard that K.L.M. was arranging to sell drugs during school, and told the principal. The principal called a public safety officer for assistance. When questioned, K. refuses to speak. The principal said, "Search him!" and the officer searched K and found marijuana.
The trial court granted K's motion to suppress, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. A school official could have gotten away with the search, but the officer could not. The fact that the officer was acting at the behest of the principal did not excuse him from the requirement that he have probable cause to search a subject.
It is imperative to fight the evidence and charges against children who are in a vulnerable position to be abused by the system. A lawyer who is knowledgeable of the available remedies is paramount to a desirable result.
Related Tags: juvenile crime, juveniles who are tried as adults, school searches in georgia, punishing juveniles as adults
Elizabeth Brandenburg has successfully handled many cases involving juveniles. To read more about Elizabeth and her juvenile law experience, please visit juvenilelawgroup.com Your Article Search Directory : Find in Articles
Recent articles in this category:
- Metal Detector Can Save Lives
Wars and unexpected accidents have been one of the many issues that have been unavoidable in the liv - Discover How Pool Float Toys Affect Your Summer Vacation
Hot. This is a perfect description what summer is. It is a feel-good time for families to enjoy a nu - Luxury Watch For Your Loved Ones and Yourself
Whether it's a birthday celebration, anniversary, Christmas or even just an ordinary day receiving g - Why Purchase Swiss Army Watches?
Wearing a wristwatch or having a pocket watch is a very important accessory of a person because it t - Personalized Groomsmen Gifts : Engraved Groomsmen Mugs
Giving something personalized for your groomsmen is a wonderful idea to let your friends feel that t - A Few Helpful Baby Shower Tips
Baby showers are wonderful occasions that usually create lasting memory for both expectant parents a - Discount Groomsmen Gifts That You Can Purchase Online
Weddings are special and memorable occasions that should be planned well, and one of the most vital - How to Wear a Knee Boot
A lot of women today are trying to integrate a knee boot into their fashion style because they are a - Wearing a Knee Boot
A knee boot is definitely something you should be investing on most especially during the cold seaso - Finding Cheap Skis
If you are a fan of various water sports, you are probably one of those people who have been in the
Most viewed articles in this category:
- Capitalism Under Attack: Petrodollars, Petroeuros and the Iranian Oil Bourse
"This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply ridiculous [...]. Havi - One Percenters
Hells Angels Inc is the most successful enterprise of its kind in Canada.In 2000 they moved into Ont - Monogamy: Is She My One and Only?
Copyright © 2007 Susan Adams After decades of matchmaking experience, years of being active in - The Best Of Oprah's Favorite Things
Oprah's annual Favorite Things show has been causing a frenzy with fans for the past six years. But - Researching British Soldiers Who Served in the 1914-18 Great War
At In the footsteps BATTLEFIELD TOURS we occasionally receive enquiries about how to trace the recor - Reefer Madness Replaced by Hydro Hysteria
In the 20's there was Reefer Madness, now we have the 21st century version; Hydro Hysteria. Mari - How Can Society Stop Sexual Predators
Perhaps society holds the lowest regard of all for sex predators, those evil men who prey on that wh - Making Communication Work For Your Relationship
Brooke said to Gary, "In our entire relationship, I've gone above and beyond for you … for us. I co - How To Attract And Seduce Women Using The 'Unmask Method'
When it comes to meeting, attracting and seducing women, most guys don't know where to start. But th - How to Keep Your Man Feeling Lucky and Happy
Your Good Man hopes that you will remain the loving, beautiful, feminine, kind, sexy American Geisha