With Levels of Consternation Riding High With Subprime Loans, Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac, Now What A
- Date: 2007-03-13 - Word Count: 1272
Share This!
FHA was created in 1934 to give homebuyers a shot at owning an affordable home. Per The Department of Housing and Urban Development more than 34 million families have been helped by the FHA programs over the years. With it's stated goal to allow families access to affordable housing. However, recent run-ups in home prices many families have been locked out of the process as FHA loan limits are far below median home prices in far too many areas. This means FHA cannot help those borrowers to get into a median priced home. Over the years, FHA has been able to implement programs that have stood the test of time. The areas of borrower counseling, budgeting, credit direction have all been a firm foundation for providing mortgage loans. The insurance aspect of the mortgage can help offset defaults and/or foreclosures. It is a program that has worked in the past and is sorely needed now. With FHA insuring mortgage loans there is little risk to lenders losing money in case of default. Thus more money to lend.
Now with subprime under extreme pressure and many lenders in this product area have shut their doors and simply gone out of business. With heavy foreclosures the secondary market buyers have turned a cold shoulder to any new loans with high-risk parameters. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been reeled in to further limit high-risk loans in their portfolios. Any volatility in their respective combined 1.3 trillion portfolios would cause tremendous financial fallout in the other financial markets. Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke is urging more conservative lending and to maintain a little steadier course steering out of the big risk waves which could bring harm to all US markets and beyond.
What tends to quickly glaze the eyes of lenders and mortgage brokers combined with frequent head slaps to the forehead are the incredible required levels of company qualification and compliance just for the privilege of doing any FHA business. This is very expensive to stake out this privilege. If FHA would chose to streamline broker participation and high compliance costs, more loans would be originated. Thus, when subprime mortgages became very attractive to lenders and brokers who were trying to assist borrowers to get into their homes of choice, that's just what they did. These programs were provided instead of FHA. As it turns out, many of these loans had low rates going in, but would accelerate in say two years with many payments wrecking havoc with family budgets. Some of these were 2/28 ARMs which gave borrower a two-year fixed rate then moving to an adjustable. As rate increases were pegged to things like the 6 month LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) plus a margin that may be in the 6% to 7%+ range it guaranteed the loan payments would accelerate dramatically after two years.
As an example: The start rate could be in the 7.50% range for the first two years. With a LIBOR index, as an example at 4.75% and the margin at 7.00% = 11.75%. It might take two years to get there after the adjustment period but going up 1% every six months could dramatically effect the monthly payment. If the mortgage were $200,000 with a start rate of 7.50% on a thirty-year term the start payments would then be $1,398.43/month. At the fully index rate of 11.75% the payment would move to $2,018.82/month. This is a payment increase of $620.39/month. For some borrowers, that is way more than they would be able to handle. Complicating this further, to avoid Private Mortgage Insurance (PMI) for any loan above 80% Loan To Value (LTV), simultaneously closed second mortgages were placed with many of those rates running from 10% to 13% which would allow for a Combined Loan To Value (CLTV) of 100%. Any first time homebuyer purchase can trigger expenditures for landscaping, furniture, and decorating upgrades then the payment increases come along and borrowers become shadowed by the eight ball.
Alphonso Jackson, HUD Secretary, proposed in June of 2006 certain changes that would once again position FHA as the first choice of first time homebuyers, which could bring them reasonable certainty of a monthly housing expense. With the mid-term elections things were put aside for other issues such as the war, minimum wage other items closer to the front burner. As things settle in industry proponents are hoping Congress will once again take a look at Secretary Jackson's proposal. Originally, there was a bipartisan support. It is thought that still is the case. In brief, loan limits in high cost areas would be closer to the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac upper loan limits. Right now, the upper limit is $417,000.00. As reported FHA Release 06-069 this might be 87% to 100% of that limit. Presently, FHA in some cases are $200,000.00 away from that limit and as a result, homebuyers are closed out of those communities from even considering an FHA loan with all that brings with it. In lower cost areas, the FHA limit might be in the 48% to 65% of the GSE (‘Government Sponsored Entity'-Fannie Mae-Freddie Mac) upper loan limits. This would be a big boost to making the program attractive to homebuyers. This proposal has been called "The Expanding American Homeownership Act" and has been laid out in H.R. 5121, representing the House of Representatives version. It was introduced April 6, 2006 and received bipartisan support with at the time 67 cosponsors and was approved by the House Financial Services Committee.
Additional provisions of the bill would be the elimination of the currently required minimum 3% investment. Alternative mortgage products are offering more attractive down payment requirements. The new proposed rules would allow for a variety of down payment options making FHA a little more user friendly. Another element of the H.R. 5121 proposed bill would be matching risk with various mortgage insurance premiums. Currently, the mortgage amount has 1.50% added on top for the Up Front Mortgage Insurance Premium or UFMIP. On a loan of $200,000 that would add $200,000.00 x 1.5% = $3,000.00. Then the new loan would be $203,000.00. A monthly MIP or Monthly Insurance Premium of .5% is added into the payment. The UFMIP and MIP all would go into a risk insurance pool to pay for defaults. The monthly MIP would be $203,000 x .5% = $1,015.00/12 = $84.58/month to the payment. If the home is sold or other non-FHA financing is put in its place within the first 84 months a portion of the UFMIP would be refunded to the borrower based on a published sliding scale. The $3,000 added UFMIP would add approximately $17.99/month on a 6.00% mortgage. In spite of these add-ons this FHA program can be far superior to any adjustable rate subprime loan.
In summary, if Congress could get back on track to finalize the proposed HUD changes, which had bipartisan support before the mid-term elections, many positive benefits could accrue to borrowers. These would be lower and predictable interest rates, higher lower limits, lower down payments with the FHA program layered over the whole mortgage product to ensure better borrower performance. Loan counseling, family budgeting, and close interaction can all help home buyers achieve their housing dreams and avoid problems down the road. If this bill was enacted it could go a long way to alleviate the down and negative pressures on subprime loans and riskier loans in the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac portfolios. Homebuyers could use the steady hand of FHA to make their homeownership a reality. FHA has been priced out of many markets. Now FHA is needed more than ever. Homebuyers would welcome action on FHA.
Dale Rogers
http://www.brokencredit.com
Now with subprime under extreme pressure and many lenders in this product area have shut their doors and simply gone out of business. With heavy foreclosures the secondary market buyers have turned a cold shoulder to any new loans with high-risk parameters. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been reeled in to further limit high-risk loans in their portfolios. Any volatility in their respective combined 1.3 trillion portfolios would cause tremendous financial fallout in the other financial markets. Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke is urging more conservative lending and to maintain a little steadier course steering out of the big risk waves which could bring harm to all US markets and beyond.
What tends to quickly glaze the eyes of lenders and mortgage brokers combined with frequent head slaps to the forehead are the incredible required levels of company qualification and compliance just for the privilege of doing any FHA business. This is very expensive to stake out this privilege. If FHA would chose to streamline broker participation and high compliance costs, more loans would be originated. Thus, when subprime mortgages became very attractive to lenders and brokers who were trying to assist borrowers to get into their homes of choice, that's just what they did. These programs were provided instead of FHA. As it turns out, many of these loans had low rates going in, but would accelerate in say two years with many payments wrecking havoc with family budgets. Some of these were 2/28 ARMs which gave borrower a two-year fixed rate then moving to an adjustable. As rate increases were pegged to things like the 6 month LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) plus a margin that may be in the 6% to 7%+ range it guaranteed the loan payments would accelerate dramatically after two years.
As an example: The start rate could be in the 7.50% range for the first two years. With a LIBOR index, as an example at 4.75% and the margin at 7.00% = 11.75%. It might take two years to get there after the adjustment period but going up 1% every six months could dramatically effect the monthly payment. If the mortgage were $200,000 with a start rate of 7.50% on a thirty-year term the start payments would then be $1,398.43/month. At the fully index rate of 11.75% the payment would move to $2,018.82/month. This is a payment increase of $620.39/month. For some borrowers, that is way more than they would be able to handle. Complicating this further, to avoid Private Mortgage Insurance (PMI) for any loan above 80% Loan To Value (LTV), simultaneously closed second mortgages were placed with many of those rates running from 10% to 13% which would allow for a Combined Loan To Value (CLTV) of 100%. Any first time homebuyer purchase can trigger expenditures for landscaping, furniture, and decorating upgrades then the payment increases come along and borrowers become shadowed by the eight ball.
Alphonso Jackson, HUD Secretary, proposed in June of 2006 certain changes that would once again position FHA as the first choice of first time homebuyers, which could bring them reasonable certainty of a monthly housing expense. With the mid-term elections things were put aside for other issues such as the war, minimum wage other items closer to the front burner. As things settle in industry proponents are hoping Congress will once again take a look at Secretary Jackson's proposal. Originally, there was a bipartisan support. It is thought that still is the case. In brief, loan limits in high cost areas would be closer to the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac upper loan limits. Right now, the upper limit is $417,000.00. As reported FHA Release 06-069 this might be 87% to 100% of that limit. Presently, FHA in some cases are $200,000.00 away from that limit and as a result, homebuyers are closed out of those communities from even considering an FHA loan with all that brings with it. In lower cost areas, the FHA limit might be in the 48% to 65% of the GSE (‘Government Sponsored Entity'-Fannie Mae-Freddie Mac) upper loan limits. This would be a big boost to making the program attractive to homebuyers. This proposal has been called "The Expanding American Homeownership Act" and has been laid out in H.R. 5121, representing the House of Representatives version. It was introduced April 6, 2006 and received bipartisan support with at the time 67 cosponsors and was approved by the House Financial Services Committee.
Additional provisions of the bill would be the elimination of the currently required minimum 3% investment. Alternative mortgage products are offering more attractive down payment requirements. The new proposed rules would allow for a variety of down payment options making FHA a little more user friendly. Another element of the H.R. 5121 proposed bill would be matching risk with various mortgage insurance premiums. Currently, the mortgage amount has 1.50% added on top for the Up Front Mortgage Insurance Premium or UFMIP. On a loan of $200,000 that would add $200,000.00 x 1.5% = $3,000.00. Then the new loan would be $203,000.00. A monthly MIP or Monthly Insurance Premium of .5% is added into the payment. The UFMIP and MIP all would go into a risk insurance pool to pay for defaults. The monthly MIP would be $203,000 x .5% = $1,015.00/12 = $84.58/month to the payment. If the home is sold or other non-FHA financing is put in its place within the first 84 months a portion of the UFMIP would be refunded to the borrower based on a published sliding scale. The $3,000 added UFMIP would add approximately $17.99/month on a 6.00% mortgage. In spite of these add-ons this FHA program can be far superior to any adjustable rate subprime loan.
In summary, if Congress could get back on track to finalize the proposed HUD changes, which had bipartisan support before the mid-term elections, many positive benefits could accrue to borrowers. These would be lower and predictable interest rates, higher lower limits, lower down payments with the FHA program layered over the whole mortgage product to ensure better borrower performance. Loan counseling, family budgeting, and close interaction can all help home buyers achieve their housing dreams and avoid problems down the road. If this bill was enacted it could go a long way to alleviate the down and negative pressures on subprime loans and riskier loans in the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac portfolios. Homebuyers could use the steady hand of FHA to make their homeownership a reality. FHA has been priced out of many markets. Now FHA is needed more than ever. Homebuyers would welcome action on FHA.
Dale Rogers
http://www.brokencredit.com
Related Tags: foreclosures, defaults, hud, fha, subprime, fannie mae, freddie mac, higher loan limits, mip, ufmip, h.r. 5121
Your Article Search Directory : Find in Articles
Recent articles in this category:
- The Secrets to Getting Low Down Payment Car Insurance
Upon purchase of a new car, there is almost always a requirement to buy an auto insurance policy as - The Wisdom Behind Auto Insurance Comparison Quotes
No one in his right mind would not go for a good deal. In fact, everyone is out on their feet and ru - The Benefits of Auto Insurance Comparisons Florida
Insurance can be expensive. This is something everyone knows about especially in the sunny state of - Auto Insurance Florida: The No-Fault Policy
There are different kinds of car insurance offered by a wide range of providers today. Different sta - Finding the Cheapest Auto Insurance Companies
Everyone is asking and searching for the cheapest auto insurance companies available today. Consider - How do You Compare Private Health Insurance Cover in Australia?
Deciding what is the best and most affordable private health insurance cover can be easy if you take - How Payment Protection Insurance Was Mis-Sold
For over six years the issue of Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) and how it was mis-sold to custom - Finding Quotes For Auto Insurance Online
One of the many concerns when you are shopping for auto insurance is being able to get access to quo - How You Can Find the Best Auto Insurance Online
When it comes to renewing your car insurance you are going to quickly discover that there are a numb - Guidelines For Searching For Auto Insurance Online
The internet can be a great source of discounts and values related to auto insurance. However, many
Most viewed articles in this category:
- Trading Forex With Pivot Points
Forex Pivot Point Trading are used today by Forex Traders and are calculated on the previous days mo - Where To Search For Free Grants
Where do you look for free grants? The search must be thorough or it could be an exercise in futilit - The Connection Between High Blood Pressure and Salt
We are a society of Salt Addicts. It cannot be denied. When you look at the things we do and the pla - Tips For Avoiding HYIP Scams
Before knowing about HYIP Scams, refer to the functioning of HYIP or "High Yield Investment Programs - Getting Credit After Bankruptcy
Consumers do not have to live sans credit following a bankruptcy. By following certain steps consume - Tips For Choosing A Credit Card
Are you looking for that perfect credit card? If so, you may be confused about what exactly to look - Cheap Car Insurance For Teens Online
Many elements determine a car insurance policy. Car insurance companies look at the person's age, hi - What Exactly Is Free Grant Money?
You can apply for free grant money from various government agencies. But where exactly does this mon - Small Business Owners Marketing and Customer Service
Marketing can be time-consuming, but it doesn't have to be hugely expensive now, thanks to the Inter - Apply Online For A Credit Card - How To Choose A Card?
The best type of credit card for you will be dependant on how you intend to use the credit card. Are