10 Mistakes In Drink Driving Cases
A huge amount of expertise comes from practical court experience. Either by prosecuting or defending individuals or businesses. That is what we have been doing for more than 20 years.
Drink Driving and Speeding cases, can involve a great deal of technical and scientific information in addition to just knowledge of the basic governing laws, our experience may be the most critical thing.
Knowledgeable defense lawyers are aware that Road Traffic cases can be among the most difficult to defend. Because of this complexity Several mistakes can be made when it comes to defending Road Traffic cases . . . mistakes which can profoundly harm their your interests. The outcome can mean losing you license, losing your job, paying considerable fines, being jailed, having a huge hike in your insurance premium, and the effect it could have on your current prospects.
When Choosing Your Lawyer Consider This........
Mistake 1- Assuming The Case Is A Loser
After getting the breath analysis test result and the copy complaint, some people might simply give up and plead guilty.
In fact, the breath test, the alcohol blood level test, and the roadside tests that the arrested person has to perform all have potential built-in flaws. Flaws which can make the difference between losing your license or not.
For example, the results of a breath test can be challenged. The Log Book detailing all tests that day can be examined by the defense to check for signs of flaws or tampering. Experts can be instructed to check the analysis machine itself and checks can be made reading the police procedures at time of testing. We have even had experience of seeing an entry that had been "tippexed" then re done.
Is it more costly to defend a case than to plead guilty? Damn right it is! That's because we really have to work for our fee in a trial.
But with so much at stake (including considerable insurance penalty fees), the possibility of winning should not be dismissed. And it may cost less than you think.
Mistake 2- Assuming The Police Always Get It Right
* the sample was not taken properly.
* the results indicate that the analysis device was not properly calibrated
* your breath sample was interrupted e.g. sickness
* you had something in your mouth, such as chewing gum, tobacco etc.
* you were on a special diet.
* you have diabetes, asthma, other relevant medical condition.
* you have ill fitting dentures.
* you had close contact in a confined space with paint or solvents.
* an alcohol antiseptic was used when blood was drawn.
* the machine having a current certification.
* calibrating the machine as often as required.
* changing the mouthpiece before the test is given.
* keeping a log of the tests run.
By not contesting the evidence you don't get to question the arresting officers. If a Trial is set the defense will get the chance to interview the police officers and examine the physical productions before you attend court. This leaves open the chance to attack the results on the grounds that the technical rules weren't followed. Mistake 3-Assuming The Breath Analysis Machine Is Infallible
Wrong. I can't think of a machine that hasn't broken down sometime. All the defense require to do is show the Sheriff that there is room for a "reasonable doubt" regarding the reliability of the machine and your license is saved.
Laymen and even lawyers are sometimes guilty of failing to read the piece of legislation that the case relates too. All the statutes and the regulations governing the use of technical equipment requires to be read and understood.
Those that don't know the laws and regulations don't realize that violations of the rules introduce into evidence matters that can be suppressed from the trial on the grounds of fairness to the accused.
Thus, to defend you properly, a lawyer should get copies of the various logs, maintenance records, printout of sample taken etc. Sadly, it has been known for lawyers and unrepresented parties to just have the complaint and the arrest report. Mistake 4- Not Objecting To Evidence
If you do not know the law in relation to what and how evidence is led, how can you possibly tender a proper and timeous objection? If you don't get this right you can easily be convicted before you realise the error of your ways.
Mistake 5- Not Personally Checking Out The Arrest Location
Many people don't visit the arrest location. And this can be crucial. In road traffic offences we often go to the scene with our clients to take relevant photographs and draft diagrams. It makes sense of all the left, right, nearside, offside, middle and don't knows that we will have to deal with at the trial.
Roadside Tests involving walking a straight line and the like are becoming increasingly used in Scotland. Seeing and knowing the locus allows you to bring better cross examination to court as you can test witnesses on true conditions that existed. e.g. sloping, ill lit roadside that is very busy with traffic.....it may be reasonable not to be walking on the kerb? These things makes it much easier for your lawyer to ask probing questions about the roadside test, and, in some cases, point out a physical impossibility to the Sheriff. We had one case where the police officer admitted that he requested our client to walk a straight line inches away from a dual carriageway. Needless to say the Sheriff wasn't too impressed by this.
Mistake 6- Not Questioning Subjective Test Procedures
An understanding of the psychological basis for these tests and the methods to be employed when they are applied is essential for proper cross examination of officers. At the very least, the police training document should be studied by you or your lawyer. He or she will then know exactly what questions to ask the arresting officer to see if he completely followed the proper method.
You see, if the manual's directions weren't completely followed, the test's validity can be attacked. Wherever your lawyer does it, a successful challenge results in the tested evidence being excluded at trial. Which significantly weakens the prosecutors case.
Even more important, officers don't always use objective scoring. The manual explains how to score the tests and how to arrive at a final score. All too often the officer simply subjectively decides whether or not you failed the tests.
What's the point? It's simple: if you or your lawyer doesn't know the training manual, how can he/she attack the way the arresting officer used it? How can he stop vital prosecution evidence from coming out. It is pretty hard to un-ring a bell. Mistake 7- Not Explaining The Discount For An Early Plea
Your lawyer should advise you about the sanctions resulting from a conviction as opposed to an early guilty plea. (The Du Ploy case)
Why are these important?
Because they can include license suspension or revocation, jail time, a significant fine, inability to rent a car, substantially higher insurance rates, and loss of your job (particularly if your job involves driving).
And this mistake can happen all to often if your lawyer is rushed or is a duty solicitor with very little time for each client. We have acted as Duty solicitor and we know how tough it is to get through maybe 30 to 40 cases in an afternoon.
You must take these extra penalties into account when deciding to plead guilty. If you're not aware of these penalties, you cannot help but be the loser. Mistake 8- The Accused Giving Evidence
Never a good idea for the accused to give evidence in Road Traffic cases. This is primarily because they are not experienced witnesses, often appearing to be nervous or anxious. Police officers often have several years experience of giving evidence and they tend to keep to the same position in their evidence throughout.
Is there ever a good time to put the accused on the stand? Yes, to directly contradict something the officer said.
Mistake 9- Attempting To Show The Police Officer Lied
All you really needs to do is show how the officer might simply be mistaken this time.
If he is lying then go head to head with him and get it out but remember that the Sheriff does not want to believe that the officer is lying. Willing to risk his career, his pension, his reputation just to "do" you on a Road Traffic charge But the Sheriff might just accept that the officer/s are mistaken. In my 20 odd years doing this I have never seen an officer break down and admit that he was lying and I suspect I never will
It's far better to simply paint the case as being about an officer who is jumping to conclusions or gilding the lily and making mistakes. Mistake 10- Not Consulting A Specialist
Defence lawyers who are experts in Road Traffic Law say that someone who isn't a specialist should consult one. Just as you wouldn't hire a criminal lawyer to sell your house or deal with your divorce. Would you employ a plumber to hang a door?
Knowing how to defend a Road traffic case case involves considerable preparation, familiarity with the law, and knowing what motions to make and what objections to take. .
He or she will quickly be able to spot potential problems and strengths in your case. He'll know what the investigation and disclosure should reveal.
If your lawyer is not a specialist in this area, you may not be getting the best advice and you may not have the strongest case.
Hire the best that you can afford.
Related Tags: driving, law, drunk, drink driving
Graham Walker is a Scottish solicitor who specializes in Road Traffic work. He has been writing articles and contributing to seminars for many years
Your Article Search Directory : Find in ArticlesRecent articles in this category:
- How to Hire a Personal Injury Attorney Toronto
There is no question that suffering from a personal injury is an incredibly difficult thing to have - Finding the Best Personal Injury Lawyer
Should you be the victim of an accident that just simply was not your fault and you have received an - DUI Perpetrators Must Seek Expert Help
It is obvious, as we progress further into the future, that behavior that puts others at risk is not - To Find the Best New York Attorney Buffalo is Still the Best Choice
If you need an attorney in New York, you would surely have a lot of options. New York has 10 cities - If You Need a Great Wisconsin Attorney Madison is the Way to Go
Are you in need of a great Wisconsin attorney? If you are from Wisconsin and need a great attorney M - What Is The Importance Of An LLP Agreement
An LLP agreement is an important contract, since without such a document the Limited Liability Partn - Personal Injury Lawyers - Get Help at Your Doorstep When Injured
As soon as you are involved in an accident, it is usually quite common for you to be injured maybe i - Personal Injury Lawyers - Knowing If You Are Entitled For a Claim
No doubts accidents do take place; however that does not mean that you should take up the liabilitie - Personal Injury Lawyers - Claiming Compensation For Your Injuries Some Tips
When you are injured, the next thing is you should know what legal rights you have; this will provid - Personal Injury Lawyers Help Victims of Car Accident Claim Financial Damages
People living in Toronto go to work through different modes of transports like trains, buses and car
Most viewed articles in this category:
- Mesothelioma Lawyer - Asbestos Attorney - Mesothelioma Lawsuits & Lung Cancer Information
Mesothelioma is one of the most tragic diseases ever to strike the working man. Due to decades of m - Michigan Personal Injury Lawyer Courts
The Michigan Courts were created by the Constitution of 1963, Article VI, and Section 1, under which - What is Entrapment?
Question: What is entrapment?Criminal Defense Lawyer: Entrapment is a defense raised by a defendan - Top 10 Tips On How To Win Your Road Traffic Accident Case
If you happen to be pursuing this thing right now then here are the top ten tips on how to win your - Agency Law
Agency Law The origins of the doctrine of necessitous intervention by someone who is in a legal rel - Procedure Of DWI In U.S.A.
ALR (Administrative License Revocation) A Program to suspend the driving license Of Drivers Which a - Mesothelioma Lawsuits Surging in United States
Mesothelioma is a cancerous disease where malignant cells develop in the lining of the chest or the - Forensic DNA Testing
Forensics is defined as the study of evidence found at a crime scene and used in a court of law. For - Arizona Drunk Driving Law, Az Drunk Driving Law & Arizona Drunk Driving Charges
Arizona drunk driving is one of the most common and deadly mistakes in Arizona while driving. Defens - Worried About the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act?
Do you work for a financial institution that collects debts? If so, do you know whether the Fair De