Voting Before The Presidential Race Is Over
- Date: 2008-10-10 - Word Count: 525
Share This!
If you were on trial, would you want the jury verdict before your defense was heard? If you are making a very important personal decision, would you want to decide before considering all the pertinent facts and information?
The answer to these two questions for most of us would be a resounding, "no" . However, nearly one third of the voters in this election will be doing just the opposite. They will be voting early and without proper consideration of all the information and facts.
They will be voting in many cases long before this Presidential election is over. In fact, by October 5, 2008, some form of voting will be occurring in twenty three American states, a full month before election day.
In the Presidential election of 2000, an estimated 12.7 million people, roughly 12 percent of voters, cast their ballots early. In 2004, that number doubled to about 25million, or about 20 percent of 122 million total voters. This year as many as one third of voters or around 40 million people are expected to vote before election day.
Also, consider that the percentage of early voting in several battleground States in 2008 is expected to exceed fifty percent of the vote. New Mexico, Washington State, Nevada and Oregon will likely see a majority of voters cast their ballots before Election Day.
Of course, it is understandable that members of the military and disabled citizens who have a valid excuse, be allowed to cast an absentee ballot prior to election day. However, the number of states offering no-excuse, in-person early voting is on the rise. In 1996, just eleven states offered it. In 2004, that number rose to twenty six. This year, with the addition of Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, New Jersey, Texas and the all-important state of Ohio, voters in thirty two states no longer need to provide a reason in order to vote early.
So what is the reason for the increase in state sponsored , no excuse, early voting? A recent USA Today article called the 2008 election, "the most extensive early voting process in history" and said it was driven by the desire of bureaucrats to avoid long lines at polling sites on Election Day.
Another reason often cited for early voting is an increase in overall voter turnout. However, there is not a single study that shows that the increase in early voting increases overall voter turnout. Meanwhile, early voting increases the risk of election fraud and frustrates the imperative for our democracy to be based on an informed electorate.
The Constitution refers the matter of Presidential voting process to the Congress not the individual states. It says: "The Congress may determine the time of choosing the electors and the day on which they shall give their votes; which day shall be the same throughout the United States." Certainly, a "day" and "time" suggest an election should be conducted on an actual Election Day not the current process of the tabulation of tens of millions of early votes for months.
The United States Congress needs to reform the rules for Presidential voting soon, before early voting elects a president, well before the race is over, prior to election day.
The answer to these two questions for most of us would be a resounding, "no" . However, nearly one third of the voters in this election will be doing just the opposite. They will be voting early and without proper consideration of all the information and facts.
They will be voting in many cases long before this Presidential election is over. In fact, by October 5, 2008, some form of voting will be occurring in twenty three American states, a full month before election day.
In the Presidential election of 2000, an estimated 12.7 million people, roughly 12 percent of voters, cast their ballots early. In 2004, that number doubled to about 25million, or about 20 percent of 122 million total voters. This year as many as one third of voters or around 40 million people are expected to vote before election day.
Also, consider that the percentage of early voting in several battleground States in 2008 is expected to exceed fifty percent of the vote. New Mexico, Washington State, Nevada and Oregon will likely see a majority of voters cast their ballots before Election Day.
Of course, it is understandable that members of the military and disabled citizens who have a valid excuse, be allowed to cast an absentee ballot prior to election day. However, the number of states offering no-excuse, in-person early voting is on the rise. In 1996, just eleven states offered it. In 2004, that number rose to twenty six. This year, with the addition of Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, New Jersey, Texas and the all-important state of Ohio, voters in thirty two states no longer need to provide a reason in order to vote early.
So what is the reason for the increase in state sponsored , no excuse, early voting? A recent USA Today article called the 2008 election, "the most extensive early voting process in history" and said it was driven by the desire of bureaucrats to avoid long lines at polling sites on Election Day.
Another reason often cited for early voting is an increase in overall voter turnout. However, there is not a single study that shows that the increase in early voting increases overall voter turnout. Meanwhile, early voting increases the risk of election fraud and frustrates the imperative for our democracy to be based on an informed electorate.
The Constitution refers the matter of Presidential voting process to the Congress not the individual states. It says: "The Congress may determine the time of choosing the electors and the day on which they shall give their votes; which day shall be the same throughout the United States." Certainly, a "day" and "time" suggest an election should be conducted on an actual Election Day not the current process of the tabulation of tens of millions of early votes for months.
The United States Congress needs to reform the rules for Presidential voting soon, before early voting elects a president, well before the race is over, prior to election day.
Related Tags: politics, election 2008, battleground states, early voting
James William Smith has worked in Senior management positions for some of the largest Financial Services firms in the United States for the last twenty five years. He has also provided business consulting support for insurance organizations and start up businesses. Visit his website at www.eWorldvu.com or his daily blog at www.eworldvublog.blogspot.com Your Article Search Directory : Find in Articles
Recent articles in this category:
- When Did The Term "racist" Turn Into A Political Tactic?
I had always thought that being a racist was a bad thing. The dictionary defines a racist as someone - Best Choice For You And Me - Palin, Tea And The Gop
Tea Party backed Christine O'Donnell's spectacular win in Delaware combined with others around the n - The International Response To Plastic Bags
Americans overwhelmingly choose plastic. Per year they use around 90 million plastic versus 5 billio - Using Comparative Effectiveness Research To Examine And Improve Health Care Reform
Our understanding of the effectiveness of healthcare interventions continues to grow - in particular - Landslides' Avalanche Of Mud.
When China observed a day of mourning on 15th August 2010 for the victims of the previous week's dea - The Fed's Role In Crisis And Recovery
Despite its apolitical mandate, the Federal Reserve remains one of the most politically sensitive in - Relocation Of 330,000 Residents Begins In Central China
In the country's largest relocation program since the Three Gorges Dam, China has ordered over 330,0 - China Launches Global English News Channel
The Chinese government owned news agency - Xinhua has started broadcasting events happening in China - After Hitting Record Lows Mortgage Rates Fall Again
The 30 year rate dropped this week from 4.69 to 4.58. This is quite a large drop for a week. What ma - U.n. Report: India And China Massively Improving Slums
China and India have improved the lives of more slum dwellers than any other country, the United Nat
Most viewed articles in this category:
- Campaign Time Again
Politicians are everywhere once more. They're on television, radio, billboards, the Internet and on - Salman Rushdie The Sensitive Prophet And Juma Gul
Between Danish cartoons and Rushdie's "Satanic Verses" that have raised the ire of Muslims worldwide - The Fight For La'au Point
There is a battle between the largest private landowner of Moloka'i (the Moloka'i Ranch) and the nat - Is Charles, The Prince Of Wales, Fit To Be King?
Charles Philip Arthur George Windsor named at his birth on the 14th of November 1948. Charles, the e - The Web And The 2008 Presidential Race
A lot of people have expressed that there is too much buzz on the upcoming 2008 presidential race. T - The Theory Of Globalization And Its Analysis
There has been considerable academic debate concerning the emergence and meaning of globalisation wi - High Fives To The Modern Day Colonists
The colonists from the 1700's would be giving the modern day colonists high fives for their spirit a - Isn't Your Job Mindset Suffocating You, Your Dreams, And Your Goals?
The chains of the corporate mindset holds people back from stepping forward and completely creating - Book On Bihar
There is one thing that I really despise - is the fact that people do raise eyebrows when you utter - End Of The World 12 21 2012
Can you imagine in 999 A.D. how many predictions that the world would come to an end there might be?