An Open Letter to the New York Times
An Open Letter To The New York Times
Dear New York Times Legal Department:
I write several commercial blogs for clients with diverse business interests. I write and manage blogs on real estate, Internet marketing, security, art and literature, software and technology, advertising media and online gambling. Recently, I received an e-mail from a commercial writer who creates content on one of your subsidiary websites. It was a very threatening letter.
In read in part, and this is a paraphrase, that my use of her material on one of my blogs constituted plagiarism and that I should remove it or be subject to her attorneys' - you - hungry ambitions. I was aghast that a fellow author didn't understand the fair use clause of U.S. copyright law.
According to a report for Congress on fair use on the Internet, written by Christopher Alan Jennings of the American Law Division, courts weigh four factors with regard to fair use, whether online or off line:
1. Purpose and character of work in question
2. Nature of copyrighted work
3. "Amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole"
4. Effect of use of the work "upon the potential market"
Now, I'm no legal scholar, but it seems to me that copying a paragraph or two and commenting on it on a blog falls into these guidelines as fair use. While there is no black and white dividing line with regard to fair use, I believe the first point (purpose and character) has a lot to do with medium. In other words, the media used in communicating a copyrighted work is essentially and inherently tied to purpose and character.
This is an important distinction because, while blogs are fairly new on the historical landscape of copyrighted material, it is very common and a fairly accepted practice - not to mention encouraged - for bloggers to copy and paste a few sentences or paragraphs from a website and add their own comments to it. Of course, it is generally recognizable that, when doing so, bloggers will link back to the quoted source as an act of attribution. This is considered fair use by the majority of bloggers who engage in this practice. It is also what I did when I "plagiarized" your subordinate author's copyrighted material.
In his report, Jennings goes on to elaborate on each of the points above, noting that purpose and character has to do with two factors - primarily commercial use and transformative use. Jennings quotes the Supreme Court with regard to the first factor: "The crux of the profit/nonprofit distinction is not whether the sole motive of the use is monetary gain, but whether the user stands to profit from the exploitation of the copyrighted material without paying the customary price." Again, I'm no legal scholar, but it seems to me that a vital question to ask in determining this crucial distinction is whether or not the commercial use of the copyrighted material could stand on its own without the material in question. Since I removed the "borrowed" material from my posts immediately upon receiving this e-mail, I think any judge would see that there is no question that my blog posts could survive without your material.
This brings me to Jennings' next point. He says in his report that "transformative use" means generally that the new use of the copyrighted material "adds something new, with a further purpose or different character, altering the first with new expression, meaning or message." Well, since I added my own comments to the "borrowed" material in order to highlight certain points that I agreed with, simply using the material as a testimonial to prove my larger point, I believe that would qualify as a valid transformative use of copyrighted material. Again, since I did link back to the original source, which constitutes attribution, I do not understand why a fellow author would consider that plagiarism.
In light of your own issues regarding plagiarism - i.e. Jayson Blair, which led to the resignation of Howell Raines and Gerald Boyd - I can understand why this might be a sensitive issue for you. Perhaps your newspaper would like to change its public image or take any attention off of yourselves due to these very serious issues that have resulted in a negative image of your company. But that's no reason to toss around false accusations. I'd encourage - indeed, I implore you - to please take the time to educate your employees on what constitutes plagiarism and fair use for bloggers and other Internet authors. I'd hate to see your company involved in other embarrassing and unnecessary legal wrangles.
Related Tags: copyright, new york times, fair use, plaigiarism
Allen Taylor writes the News and Media Blog at http:newsandmediablog.com.
Your Article Search Directory : Find in ArticlesRecent articles in this category:
- What New Artists and Musicians Can Do to Keep From Being Taken Advantage of - See a California Music & Entertainment Lawyer
There is probably no other profession than the music business where so many people will try to take - A San Diego and Palm Springs California Literary and Publishing Attorney Looks at the Harry Potter Case Ruling and Copyright Infringement Law
If you are a writer, a publisher, a California copyright attorney, a literary agent or lawyer anywh - Irs Tax Relief - the Most Popular Irs Tax Relief Solutions
Tax law provides many solutions for resolving tax debt. But if you were to contact the IRS directly - Everyone Is A Winner with Private Label Rights
Private label rights are by far one of the best things out there in the world of online marketing. - Filing Compensation Claims for Death at Workplace
If anything, today's time gives us the possibility to claim for just about everything. With this in - Art Lawyer: Buy Only the Original
It is widely said that art in any form is capable of mesmerizing its audiences be it through dance - Art Lawyer: Seek Only the Original
Art is something, which only an aesthetically refined personality can admire. It requires large dos - When Can You Get Compensation for Whiplash?
Out of the numerous types of injuries, such as strains, back injuries, broken limbs, temporary/pe - Fyi on Spouse Benefits
Normal 0 MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 st1:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } /* Style Definit - Keeping the Agreement Confidential
Normal 0 MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 st1:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } /* Style Definitions *
Most viewed articles in this category:
- Discover Your Creativity
You have a choice. Do you want to be constructive and positive in a unique way? Or do you want to be - Shout it: Save Our Net Neutrality!
Working in online advertising at ICMediadirect.com has familiarized me with some of the larger issue - 6 Sources For Hot Article Ideas
It's an established fact of internet marketing that one of the most effective forms of free advertis - 5 Business Essentials (Besides Great Copywriting) To Maximize Your Sales Success
Effective copywriting is one piece of the puzzle. But you also need some basic business essentials. - There is an Article Deep Down Inside of You Just Looking to Bust Out
The Most Economical Way to Advertise online is to Submit Articles online for Redistribution. O - Web Copy - What You Should Now First
Just what is web copy? Some people think that web copy is anything that is written on a web page. Bu - Why Hire a Freelance Copywriter?
Why should you hire a freelance copywriter to help with your marketing materials? Well, because free - Different Kinds of Website - Which suits you?
Often the best type of website for you to launch for your business depends on the on the nature of y - Myths About Copyright
Beware of these myths about copyrighted materials:If it doesn't have a copyright notice, it's not co - Profit Boosters Copywriting Checklist
Before writing1. Study the company and the product/service being sold thoroughly so you have all the