Ron Paul's Revenge
- Date: 2008-09-03 - Word Count: 713
Share This!
Don't invite Ron Paul to your party, unless you want him to tear it apart. Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was going to pull a fast one at the DNC, and do something devious to undermine the rival whom the party picked over her. But she didn't. She endorsed Obama fully and wholeheartedly, doing her best to reunite a party torn asunder by their bitter rivalry. Would that Ron Paul had such grace. But, like a spoiled child, if he can't be the nominee, he'll take his marbles and go hold his own party somewhere else, doing his best to create a distraction from the RNC, siphon off as many votes as he can, and undermine the very party of which he claims to be a member.
Ron Paul used to call himself a Libertarian. I was a Libertarian for 30 years before switching to the Republican Party a couple of months ago. I still believe in the traditional libertarian ideals of individual freedom, individual responsibility, and limited government. The reason I switched parties is because I recognize the practical need to unite with other conservatives to focus all our efforts behind electing the most fiscally conservative candidates, in the interest of reining in the growth of big government and the proliferation of socialist economic policies. In this election, that candidate is John McCain. And I anticipate that it's going to be a very close race.
Ron Paul doesn't have a chance, never will have a chance, and the only possible effect of his little diversion will be to divide the conservative vote and help get Obama elected. Ron Paul calls himself a Republican. His political positions are far closer to McCain's than to Obama's. But Ron Paul doesn't really care who gets elected to lead our country. All he cares about is the greater glory of Ron Paul. He's nothing but a narcissist who's willing to sacrifice the best interests of his party, and his country, to his own personal ego.
This is not a first for him. The Libertarian Party used to be the strongest third party in the country. In 1980, Ed Clarke made a credible run for the presidency and drew a lot of positive attention to the party. The Libertarian Party was gaining momentum and support throughout the nation, until 1988 when Ron Paul single-handedly split the party in two.
The Libertarian Party has always stood for minimal government involvement in people's private lives. Traditionally it has had a strong pro-choice contingent. But a lot of Libertarians are also pro-life. Some Libertarians uphold the individual rights of women to make their own choices regarding their own bodies and lives. Others believe we must protect the individual rights of the unborn. But the party had never made abortion the core focus of their platform, and rightly so, because there's little any candidate can actually do about this highly emotional issue. Changing the law would require nothing less than a Constitutional amendment.
But Ron Paul decided to make it a dividing issue for the party. After being chosen as the official Libertarian candidate, he made abortion one of the top planks in his personal platform, referring to himself as a "Pro-Life Libertarian." That split the party right down the middle. The pro-choice Libertarians felt used and undermined, so they went looking for their own candidate. The candidate they found was Russell Means. Russell Means, IMHO, was simply an opportunist who saw running for president as a good way to get a national venue to highlight his own special interests. The effect was a complete split of the previously united Libertarian Party, over an issue that had never been a dividing issue before. That was, effectively, the end of the Libertarian Party as a viable third party. It never did recover.
Ron Paul must have felt a great sense of power at having been able to divide and conquer an up-and-coming political force in the nation, all by himself. Now he's looking to do the same thing to the Republican Party. It must be a real rush for Ron Paul to have such power. Too bad for the rest of the Republican Party but, who cares? At least Ron Paul will make a good showing and everybody will know how popular he is. He's pathetic.
Ron Paul used to call himself a Libertarian. I was a Libertarian for 30 years before switching to the Republican Party a couple of months ago. I still believe in the traditional libertarian ideals of individual freedom, individual responsibility, and limited government. The reason I switched parties is because I recognize the practical need to unite with other conservatives to focus all our efforts behind electing the most fiscally conservative candidates, in the interest of reining in the growth of big government and the proliferation of socialist economic policies. In this election, that candidate is John McCain. And I anticipate that it's going to be a very close race.
Ron Paul doesn't have a chance, never will have a chance, and the only possible effect of his little diversion will be to divide the conservative vote and help get Obama elected. Ron Paul calls himself a Republican. His political positions are far closer to McCain's than to Obama's. But Ron Paul doesn't really care who gets elected to lead our country. All he cares about is the greater glory of Ron Paul. He's nothing but a narcissist who's willing to sacrifice the best interests of his party, and his country, to his own personal ego.
This is not a first for him. The Libertarian Party used to be the strongest third party in the country. In 1980, Ed Clarke made a credible run for the presidency and drew a lot of positive attention to the party. The Libertarian Party was gaining momentum and support throughout the nation, until 1988 when Ron Paul single-handedly split the party in two.
The Libertarian Party has always stood for minimal government involvement in people's private lives. Traditionally it has had a strong pro-choice contingent. But a lot of Libertarians are also pro-life. Some Libertarians uphold the individual rights of women to make their own choices regarding their own bodies and lives. Others believe we must protect the individual rights of the unborn. But the party had never made abortion the core focus of their platform, and rightly so, because there's little any candidate can actually do about this highly emotional issue. Changing the law would require nothing less than a Constitutional amendment.
But Ron Paul decided to make it a dividing issue for the party. After being chosen as the official Libertarian candidate, he made abortion one of the top planks in his personal platform, referring to himself as a "Pro-Life Libertarian." That split the party right down the middle. The pro-choice Libertarians felt used and undermined, so they went looking for their own candidate. The candidate they found was Russell Means. Russell Means, IMHO, was simply an opportunist who saw running for president as a good way to get a national venue to highlight his own special interests. The effect was a complete split of the previously united Libertarian Party, over an issue that had never been a dividing issue before. That was, effectively, the end of the Libertarian Party as a viable third party. It never did recover.
Ron Paul must have felt a great sense of power at having been able to divide and conquer an up-and-coming political force in the nation, all by himself. Now he's looking to do the same thing to the Republican Party. It must be a real rush for Ron Paul to have such power. Too bad for the rest of the Republican Party but, who cares? At least Ron Paul will make a good showing and everybody will know how popular he is. He's pathetic.
Related Tags: politics, election, conservative, republican, clinton, hillary, libertarian, ron paul, rnc, ronstock
NotYourDaddy is a conservative libertarian who believes in free will and the free market. NYD thinks the role of the government is to protect the rights and liberties of its citizens. Stop there. NYD's attitude toward ever-expanding government can best be summed up by snarling "Get your hand out of my pocket and leave me alone!"Visit NotYourDaddy's blog at Government is Not Your Daddy. Your Article Search Directory : Find in Articles
Recent articles in this category:
- Sarah Palin - Too Good For Us
Sarah Palin has obviously struck a chord with a large swath of the American people, and the obvious - Snoopy, The Peanut Sunday Comics, And Our Skyrocketing $13 Trillion Federal Budget
Recent news stories remind me of an old Sunday Peanuts comic strip. Snoopy is out jogging one day wh - U.s. Manufacturing Jobs Move From Hostile To Friendly Environments
I worked in the electronics industry in various management positions expanding over 35 years. The la - Commitment Vs.involvement: In An Egg And Ham Sandwich, The Chicken Is Involved, The Pig Is Committed
A recent article in the St. Petersburg Times by Robert Trigaux reminded me of this grand old saying: - Get Hot With Athleanx
Remember that song, "Don't you wish your girlfriend was hot like me"? Catchy tune, funny lyrics, sun - "change" To What?
When the boys got together in the 1700's to put America together, they looked back at the littered l - You're Working Too Fast!
"Very often the idler is but a man to whom it is repugnant to make all his life the eighteenth part - Unionize And Strike!
"The worker cannot rise as a worker without joining in unity with other workers and helping all. Thi - Foxophobia, Triskaidekaphobia - Fickle Phantasms From The White House?
President Obama's persistence in singling Fox News out for scoffing and scolding has generated more - What Is Your Relationship With Work?
"If society be held desirable, it surely must be free, equal, and reciprocal society, where benefits
Most viewed articles in this category:
- U.s. Interests Are Imprisoned By Guantanamo
As a Vietnam veteran with 26 years in uniform, I have no sympathy for terrorists. But I am dismayed - The Rule Of Law, Discrimination, And Morality
In an article titled "Places Far Away, Places Very near - Mauthausen, the Camps of the Shoah, and th - The Weeping Of The Earth For Her Children: A Planetary Prayer For Light
"Four years after the US-led invasion, the ICRC says the conflict is inflicting immense suffering, a - I Dislike Bush & Co. More Than Lyndon Johnson Or Richard Nixon
On the evening Lyndon Johnson dropped out of the 1968 Presidential it was a celebration. We could no - Anhydrous Ammonia Spill Day
It looks like someone declared June 8, 2007 to be the day for serious Anhydrous Ammonia spills from - You Can't Eat That - The Great War For Your Body
Surprise, surprise; our government/media complex is at it again. In their constant drive to control - "addiction To Big Government" Is It A Necessary Evil?
I was deeply concerned this morning when I received my regular AFA (American Family Association) ema - Uae's Imbalanced Demography Poses Concerns
Even as Dubai's rising expatriate population is being projected as a measure of its association with - From First Lady To President Of The United States
It absolutely drives me crazy every time I hear people say, "Oh she was such a controversial first l - Exclusionary Ideas Of Progress
Communism, Fascism, Nazism, and Religious Fundamentalism are as utopian as the classical Idea of Pro