Understanding The Main Causes Leading To Six Sigma Redundancies


by Tony Jacowski - Date: 2008-05-31 - Word Count: 494 Share This!

However, businesses still need to use caution, because what is also true is that not all innovative techniques deliver the desired results - and that some may even result in gross failures and redundancies.

This is applicable even to some of the most effective techniques such as Six Sigma that aims at improving quality and reducing costs by limiting the number of defects occurring in a given business process.

Understanding Six Sigma Redundancies

Six Sigma may have a high success rate, but that should not be used as a reason for complacency - because what works for an organization does not necessarily mean that it will work just as well in every other organization. Some businesses don't think twice before implementing Six Sigma and do so in any given business process that might exist.

Implementing Six Sigma without giving a proper thought to how actually it will affect the targeted business process is often the thing that leads to Six Sigma redundancies. Experienced Six Sigma professionals know this very well and this is why they stress ascertaining the potential affects that a Six Sigma initiative can have on a business process.

There are many other factors that can lead to Six Sigma redundancies, but identifying those is not an easy task because most Six Sigma implementation projects are spread out over four to six months and are carried out through the process of trials and errors. Obviously this makes it difficult to pinpoint exactly which improvement initiatives are giving the desired results and which ones are not.

For finding the root causes, Six Sigma professionals rely on various tools and techniques such as Analysis of variance using ANOVA and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA).

Other Reasons for Redundancy

Although one might blame the usage of the wrong Six Sigma tools for bringing about redundancy, it should also be kept in mind that the employee's mindset about the change should be positive. If the employee is not willing to accept the necessary changes, it can lead to a serious Six Sigma redundancy.

When bringing about any change, the Six Sigma strategy will prove to be a success only if the employees cooperate and support the project. The major misconception that the employees have in this respect is that they feel that by adopting the implementations of the Six Sigma strategy, the organization will ultimately be downsized.
Another alarming fact is that, aside from the employees, even some departmental heads develop a cynical attitude about the change that the Six Sigma strategy promises to bring in.

Many Six Sigma analysts use the same tools that were used during the implementation stages in order to avoid chances of any redundancy stages. Therefore, instead of using any special tools, the analysts should make sure that departmental heads are equally involved throughout the Six Sigma process.

This will help to erase any doubts that might have come up, thereby building better relations with other employees and having a positive impact on the company.


Related Tags: six sigma implementation, six sigma process, six sigma overview, six simga, six simga redundancies

Tony Jacowski is a quality analyst for The MBA Journal. Aveta Solution's Six Sigma Online offers online six sigma training and certification classes for six sigma professionals including, lean six sigma, black belts, green belts, and yellow belts.

Your Article Search Directory : Find in Articles

© The article above is copyrighted by it's author. You're allowed to distribute this work according to the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs license.
 

Recent articles in this category:



Most viewed articles in this category: