Filing a patent infringement lawsuit requires consideration to numerous values prior to making a decision. Suing needs to be something you believe is the right step, otherwise it is bound to become a headache the size of the Grand Canyon weighing you down. Lawsuits are typically filed when the infringed upon feels they have lost or are likely to lose revenue as a result of the patent infringement. A lawyer's advice can prove to be invaluable when making a decision whether or not to sue a patent infringer.

Filing a lawsuit typically requires having confidence in the lawyer. Patents are filed and granted on the basis of having a unique idea or invention. Having the right to market a particular product or invention exclusively can be very profitable. Protecting that right and those profits are why we have laws in the first place. Filing a lawsuit is as important as standing up for any other law protected right of free enterprise.

While not all lawsuits are filed based on the infringers deceit or attempt to defraud, however it takes the investigative power of a high quality lawyer to determine whether the patent infringement was based on malicious intent. Those who attempted it with malice are perfectly deserving of the judgment that may ultimately be awarded to the victim.

Taking any potential case to most lawyers will naturally result in a discussion of a lawsuit. After all, patent infringement law is their specialty. However, a lawyer can take the time to explain all your options if you are not comfortable with the idea of filing a lawsuit.

However it is typically in a victim's best interest to file a lawsuit basically as soon as the infringement is discovered. It does have a statute of limitations, and a victim can not change their mind later and file the lawsuit.

Lawyers understand the very technical and intense laws that coincide with lawsuits. A good lawyer can decipher these intricate and difficult to understand laws and advise you of how a victim typically goes about each step of filing a lawsuit. Keeping close contact with your lawyer will make the process more understandable and of course smoother as you near an actual trial date.

Types of Patent Infringement:

There are different types of patent infringement, and of course each type is considered a violation of current patent infringement laws. Despite the fact that most companies have researchers to avoid it, the incident rate of it is increasing.

Patent infringement is defined as any type of unauthorized use, manufacturing, or sale of a patented item. Direct patent infringement is the most obvious and the most common form of it. The highest percentage of cases involve the direct kind. In the most basic definition, direct patent infringement means the marketing, sale, or commercial use of an exact patented item or invention that performs substantially the identical function.

Indirect patent infringement is categorized into two variations. Indirect patent infringement suggests that there was some amount of either deceit or even accidental patent infringement in the incident. Indirect patent infringement includes infringement by inducement and contributory patent infringement.

Patent infringement by inducement is considered when an action or an activity by a third party causes an act of it. This may mean the sale of parts that in realistic evaluation can only be used for a previously patented invention.

Patent infringement by inducement can also include licensing an invention that has previously been patented, or the sale of an invention which includes instructions that when used specifically infringe on a previously patented invention. By inducement typically means that the inducer willingly and knowingly aided in the infringement but may or may not have specifically intended to violate it.

Contributory patent infringement is typically defined as the sale of materials or components which have no other commercial use than their intended use by the patented invention. Contributory is very similar to induced patent infringement, the basic difference between the two involving the specific intent. Contributory infringement involves a higher level of culpable intent.

The basic types of it are segregated by direct and indirect patent infringement. Direct is usually easier to identify and more prominently accidental. Either way, patent infringement is a serious offense and often ends up in the court room with high damage awards.

Patent infringement, either direct or indirect, can have serious financial consequences for a company, regardless of the company's size. It interferes with the company's ability to exclusively market the invention and capitalize on their own ingenious. Capitalizing on their own patented invention allows for company growth, and a flourishing company is one that provides jobs, job security, and a steady market.

Laws are very technical and complicated. It can be remarkably difficult without an attorney to interpret these laws to understand exactly which instances of indirect patent infringement qualifies as patent infringement and what may very well be acceptable under the law.

Laws are in place to protect those who are able to take advantage of the American dream, free enterprise at its very best. The concept of creating a new invention, being aptly rewarded for it, and improving society on some level is an exciting proposition. Laws allow inventors and companies to continuously seek out the betterment of a product. Direct or indirect patent infringement hurts more than a wealthy company, it hurts business overall. The impact of it can be far reaching and in some cases financially devastating.

When dealing with it, either direct or indirect, there is a lot at stake for both the accused and the infringed upon, and attaining the best lawyer is a vital step in protecting your patent rights. It takes a quality lawyer to be able to interpret the complicated laws correctly and present a solid and effective case.

While it is possible to violate patent infringement laws accidentally, that is the reason that companies hire researchers. Even if a company is guilty of accidental infringement they are still guilty of it, as ignorance is not a valid excuse for breaking the law.

The award amount may be less for a company that violates laws accidentally, but the damage is the same whether or not it was done intentionally or accidentally.

It is the responsibility of the offending company to be assured that their product or invention does not violate any patent infringement laws prior to launching their marketing program and introducing their product or invention.