Hidden Negative Equity for UK Landlords
- Date: 2007-10-19 - Word Count: 1244
Share This!
I read over the weekend about the very sorry affair of a novice female landlord . This newbie landlord's problems began back in 2003 when she was enticed at a ‘property seminar' by the promise of a ‘fast buck' to invest in 4 ‘off plan' buy-to-let properties. Now this poor landlord is facing financial ruin as one by one the buy-to-let mortgage companies have repossessed her buy-to-let investments.
This landlord's problems were three fold:
1. The rents the landlord was promised by the sales staff were never realised.
2. The landlord's unrealistic rental expectations resulted in her holding out for too high rents which she never obtained, as a result she incurred high voids (her properties were only let for 70-80% of the time).
3. The prices that the landlord bought at even with an alleged discount were considerably above any realistic market value. The result is a significant capital loss when the properties are finally sold; this is likely to be in the order of 30-40%.
In addition to these direct problems with the landlord's buy-to-let property portfolio, the landlord also borrowed money to pay the mortgages on her properties when they were empty. This additional borrowing now totals some £100,000.
I suspect that this poor lady landlord is not alone amongst landlords. I am careful to point out that I along with the rest of the team at Property Hawk have been strongly advising landlords to steer clear of this type of ‘discounted' off-plan investments from the beginning. Sadly some landlords have already circum to the sales pitch. PLEASE DON'T FALL FOR IT!
All this prompted me to think, what would I do if I was confronted with this situation?
PLAN OF ACTION
Firstly, the solution to any problem starts with the fact that you as a landlord accept that there is a problem. Too many newbie landlords are still in denial. They bought a buy-to-let 2 bed apartment say 3 years ago for £150,000. "Everybody knows that house prices have been going up".
Therefore it is worth at least £150,000, probably a bit more. The reality is unless a landlord has bought in London, this is very unlikely to be the case. The glut of new build ‘luxury' buy-to-let apartments has meant that supply outstrips demand and this continues to depress values.
Therefore a landlord needs to get an accurate value of what their property investment is really worth. On the face of it this is not difficult. Thanks to the land registry there are now numerous websites where a landlord can get the prices for actual sales in or around their property. I would suggest Our Property as one of the best.
However, landlords should be aware that where properties were sold with a discount, the list price and not the discounted or actual sales price is often shown. Otherwise get a couple of local estate agents to give you a value and ask them to price it to sell. Agents will otherwise tell you, their prospective client what you want to hear to get your business. This is not necessarily the hard truth. After this process, you as the landlord and buy-to-let property owner will need to sit down and face up to how you are going to approach your hidden negative equity.
I'll just hand back the keys!
Some landlord's think that getting rid of their buy-to-let negative equity is as easy as just handing back the keys for their residential investment to their buy-to-let mortgage company. That way the residential investment property is no longer their problem.
"The buy-to-let mortgage company can sort it out!"
Again, unfortunately wrong. The buy-to-let mortgage company will indeed eventually repossess a landlord's buy-to-let investment if a landlord stops paying the buy-to-let mortgage. The buy-to-let mortgage company will then sell the landlord's residential investment property. However, an empty buy-to-let apartment which the market knows is a forced sale, probably sold at auction mean that the chances are that the buy-to-let property will be bought by another buy-to-let investor who will scrutinise the investment figures and will be looking for a property bargain (BMV property).
The chances are in this case that a buy-to-let investment property will not even get looked at by 90% of property buyers who are owner / occupiers. Not only do owner / occupiers make up the bulk of prospective purchasers but also are likely to pay more. This is because they are ultimately looking for a home and therefore are not constrained by financial returns in the way that buy-to-let investors are. The outcome of a forced sale by the buy-to-let mortgage company of a landlord's investment property is that the landlord is likely to get less for their buy-to-let investment than if they were in control of the selling process.
How does a landlord secure a property bargain?
The reality is that the buy-to-let mortgage company is not overly bothered about getting the top price, particularly where they can easily recoup their mortgage advance. Their aim is simple, to sell the repossessed buy-to-let investment property as soon as they can. Once the buy-to-let mortgage company has sold the residential investment property they will present the landlord with a bill. This demand will include any shortfall in the repayment of the outstanding buy-to-let mortgage, missed buy-to-let mortgage payments and charges and expenses incurred in disposing of the residential investment property. These charges are likely to be significant and the total demand from the buy-to-let mortgage company could easily run into tens of thousands of pounds. A sum that is likely to take a property investor many, many years to pay off.
A landlord's best options
The best option for a landlord in this unfortunate situation is firstly having faced the facts is to take control. A landlord should use their realistic valuations for their buy-to-let investment to work out how much their negative equity is. Then, a landlord needs to work out a strategy to start repaying it. This may not be easy. Many landlords on interest only mortgages are already struggling to meet their buy-to-let mortgage repayments. However, I would suggest that a landlord should consider these four points:
1. Landlords should look for is a low Annual Percentage Rate (APR). This will ensure that they minimise the payments necessary over the period of the loan. It is possible to get APRs in the low 6%.
2. Landlords should consider using any savings to make a one off over payment on their buy-to-let mortgage account and reduce their negative equity that way.
3. If a landlord has a mortgage on their home it may well be that they can re-mortgage their domestic property at a better interest rate and use these funds to part repay their buy-to-let mortgage thereby wiping out their negative equity.
4. The best way for me is if a landlord's rents are strong is to convert their loan from all interest only to part repayment. This way the landlord can use the cash generative quality of their buy-to-let property investment to slowly repay any negative equity.
Inaction is not an option.
One thing I would strongly advice landlords in this unfortunate situation is not to ignore it. It is not going to be tempered by fast rising house prices as has happened in previous years. Therefore a landlord should ‘face the music', take advice from professionals mortgage consultants on their options and above all ensure that they pay off their negative equity to give them as a landlord and property investor a secure long-term and sustainable property investment.
Chris Horne manages the Landlords Homepage at http://www.propertyhawk.co.uk
This landlord's problems were three fold:
1. The rents the landlord was promised by the sales staff were never realised.
2. The landlord's unrealistic rental expectations resulted in her holding out for too high rents which she never obtained, as a result she incurred high voids (her properties were only let for 70-80% of the time).
3. The prices that the landlord bought at even with an alleged discount were considerably above any realistic market value. The result is a significant capital loss when the properties are finally sold; this is likely to be in the order of 30-40%.
In addition to these direct problems with the landlord's buy-to-let property portfolio, the landlord also borrowed money to pay the mortgages on her properties when they were empty. This additional borrowing now totals some £100,000.
I suspect that this poor lady landlord is not alone amongst landlords. I am careful to point out that I along with the rest of the team at Property Hawk have been strongly advising landlords to steer clear of this type of ‘discounted' off-plan investments from the beginning. Sadly some landlords have already circum to the sales pitch. PLEASE DON'T FALL FOR IT!
All this prompted me to think, what would I do if I was confronted with this situation?
PLAN OF ACTION
Firstly, the solution to any problem starts with the fact that you as a landlord accept that there is a problem. Too many newbie landlords are still in denial. They bought a buy-to-let 2 bed apartment say 3 years ago for £150,000. "Everybody knows that house prices have been going up".
Therefore it is worth at least £150,000, probably a bit more. The reality is unless a landlord has bought in London, this is very unlikely to be the case. The glut of new build ‘luxury' buy-to-let apartments has meant that supply outstrips demand and this continues to depress values.
Therefore a landlord needs to get an accurate value of what their property investment is really worth. On the face of it this is not difficult. Thanks to the land registry there are now numerous websites where a landlord can get the prices for actual sales in or around their property. I would suggest Our Property as one of the best.
However, landlords should be aware that where properties were sold with a discount, the list price and not the discounted or actual sales price is often shown. Otherwise get a couple of local estate agents to give you a value and ask them to price it to sell. Agents will otherwise tell you, their prospective client what you want to hear to get your business. This is not necessarily the hard truth. After this process, you as the landlord and buy-to-let property owner will need to sit down and face up to how you are going to approach your hidden negative equity.
I'll just hand back the keys!
Some landlord's think that getting rid of their buy-to-let negative equity is as easy as just handing back the keys for their residential investment to their buy-to-let mortgage company. That way the residential investment property is no longer their problem.
"The buy-to-let mortgage company can sort it out!"
Again, unfortunately wrong. The buy-to-let mortgage company will indeed eventually repossess a landlord's buy-to-let investment if a landlord stops paying the buy-to-let mortgage. The buy-to-let mortgage company will then sell the landlord's residential investment property. However, an empty buy-to-let apartment which the market knows is a forced sale, probably sold at auction mean that the chances are that the buy-to-let property will be bought by another buy-to-let investor who will scrutinise the investment figures and will be looking for a property bargain (BMV property).
The chances are in this case that a buy-to-let investment property will not even get looked at by 90% of property buyers who are owner / occupiers. Not only do owner / occupiers make up the bulk of prospective purchasers but also are likely to pay more. This is because they are ultimately looking for a home and therefore are not constrained by financial returns in the way that buy-to-let investors are. The outcome of a forced sale by the buy-to-let mortgage company of a landlord's investment property is that the landlord is likely to get less for their buy-to-let investment than if they were in control of the selling process.
How does a landlord secure a property bargain?
The reality is that the buy-to-let mortgage company is not overly bothered about getting the top price, particularly where they can easily recoup their mortgage advance. Their aim is simple, to sell the repossessed buy-to-let investment property as soon as they can. Once the buy-to-let mortgage company has sold the residential investment property they will present the landlord with a bill. This demand will include any shortfall in the repayment of the outstanding buy-to-let mortgage, missed buy-to-let mortgage payments and charges and expenses incurred in disposing of the residential investment property. These charges are likely to be significant and the total demand from the buy-to-let mortgage company could easily run into tens of thousands of pounds. A sum that is likely to take a property investor many, many years to pay off.
A landlord's best options
The best option for a landlord in this unfortunate situation is firstly having faced the facts is to take control. A landlord should use their realistic valuations for their buy-to-let investment to work out how much their negative equity is. Then, a landlord needs to work out a strategy to start repaying it. This may not be easy. Many landlords on interest only mortgages are already struggling to meet their buy-to-let mortgage repayments. However, I would suggest that a landlord should consider these four points:
1. Landlords should look for is a low Annual Percentage Rate (APR). This will ensure that they minimise the payments necessary over the period of the loan. It is possible to get APRs in the low 6%.
2. Landlords should consider using any savings to make a one off over payment on their buy-to-let mortgage account and reduce their negative equity that way.
3. If a landlord has a mortgage on their home it may well be that they can re-mortgage their domestic property at a better interest rate and use these funds to part repay their buy-to-let mortgage thereby wiping out their negative equity.
4. The best way for me is if a landlord's rents are strong is to convert their loan from all interest only to part repayment. This way the landlord can use the cash generative quality of their buy-to-let property investment to slowly repay any negative equity.
Inaction is not an option.
One thing I would strongly advice landlords in this unfortunate situation is not to ignore it. It is not going to be tempered by fast rising house prices as has happened in previous years. Therefore a landlord should ‘face the music', take advice from professionals mortgage consultants on their options and above all ensure that they pay off their negative equity to give them as a landlord and property investor a secure long-term and sustainable property investment.
Chris Horne manages the Landlords Homepage at http://www.propertyhawk.co.uk
Related Tags: property, software, price, free, management, pr, landlord, landlords, agreement, deposit, inventory, crash, scheme, letting, tenancy, section 21, property price crash
Your Article Search Directory : Find in Articles
Recent articles in this category:
- 5 Reasons to Buy Jasper Real Estate
Jasper is a small town in North Georgia and it is growing rapidly. Since North Georgia Foreclosures - Ellijay Real Estate
Ellijay Georgia has always been known for it's outdoor activities and seasonal festivals. Downtown E - How to Deal With Blocked Drains
A blocked drain is an occurrence that happens eventually to all households. You may have experienced - The Benefits of Hiring a Plumbing Consultant
Your dream home may not always be brand new, with fresh paint and home essentials. There are certain - The Worst Mistake You Can Make When You Apply to Rent a Home
A whole new class of people has become renters and potential renters in America during the last thre - State of Individual Real Estate Markets
Everybody is well aware of the hit that the real estate market has taken over the past three years. - Thoughts on Avoiding the Landlord Trap
I've heard several people say they would never invest in a multifamily rental property because they - An Idea to Increase the Bottom Line of Your Investment Property
Are you pretty sure that you've already maximized the income coming from your property? If you've cl - Finding the Value of a Piece of Investment Real Estate
There is a lot of confusion about how much investment property is really worth. We'll look at three - Arkansas Land For Sale - Search Engine Optimization and Your Website
If you have Arkansas land for sale and are interested in advertising it on your website I have a few
Most viewed articles in this category:
- How High Did Home Prices Really Go
The U.S. Census Bureau released data on Tuesday that revealed where the nation's hottest markets wer - New Homeowners Tips for Household Safety
With so many items on their ¡°buying a home¡± checklist, few homeowners take into considerati - Truth About VA Foreclosures
Many people now days are finding themselves out of work and not being able to make the mortgage paym - Avoid Rookie Real Estate Investing Mistakes
When Robert Kiyosaki, author of the Rich Dad book series, bought his first property he was, of cours - Finding The Perfect Roommate On Craigslist
Craigslist, Roommates, and The Concerns Craigslist is "great" when it comes to looking for housing - The Forgotten Secret To Selling Property - Simple, Quick And Cheap
Why spend big dollars trying to get people to drive a long way to see your house, when your best pro - Get Amazing Results Selling Real Estate Online
This is the age of the internet. Why not take advantage of the widespread use of the internet to ad - Dallas Real Estate Information
In the United States, Dallas is considered as the second leading state according to the area. If any - The Largest Private Equity Indian Real Estate Deal
In the largest private equity deal won by the real estate sector, Morgan Stanley Real Estate has inv - Fractional Real Estate Ownership
Fractional ownership of vacation ski condos is growing in popularity. Park City Utah a popular ski t