Scientists Must Take Charge of Genetically Modified Food Debate
- Date: 2006-12-27 - Word Count: 503
Share This!
A while ago, I rallied scientists all over the world to stand up and defend the science behind genetically modified foods. I did this out of concern that anti-technology activists are drowning scientists' voices regarding the safety of genetically modified foods. I counseled them to take charge of the debate about genetically modified foods or completely cease research in crop genetics. I reasoned that scientific innovations are only worth their salt if they are well marketed to the public.
Sadly, this has not been the case with genetically modified foods. Scientists, for reasons only known to them, have taken a backseat in this debate. Anti-technology activists, most of whom lack the scantiest knowledge of biology, have taken it upon themselves to rubbish crop genetic engineering.
Armed with what I consider "bootleg scientific evidence", these activists want the world to believe that genetically modified foods are poisonous concoctions. In essence, they seek to challenge crop genetic engineering and its potential applications in agriculture.
As anti-biotech rhetoric fills the air, questions are being asked whether scientists are doing enough to defend their work. They aren't. Most seem to be at home expressing their thoughts in peer-reviewed journals, and hard-to-decipher textbooks. All these are out of reach of the general public, the critical constituent in the debate about genetically modified foods.
Scientists all over the world, come out in the open and defend your innovations! Those, especially, working in the area of genomics must move from their cocoon of silence and indifference. The current situation where anti-technology activists continue to recklessly mislead the world about genetically modified foods is unacceptable.
Scientists have left the work of defending genetically modified foods to public relations practitioners and marketing agents. These people least understand the science behind genetically modified foods, and shouldn't be expected to defend it the way scientists would do. Were scientists to shed off their white lab coats and confront anti-technology activists, the debate about genetically modified foods would take a totally different shape.
Perhaps, they can borrow a leaf from Scotland's new chief scientific adviser, Professor Anne Glover. Since her appointment, Glover has vigorously defended genetically modified foods. Hers has not been the usual balderdash about genetically modified foods. All Prof. Glove's arguments are well anchored in science.
Speaking to The Sunday Herald recently, Glover heralded genetically modified foods as an effective tool to fight poverty, hunger and toxic pollution.
A molecular biologist from the University of Aberdeen, Glover lamented that the public debate about genetically modified foods has been "really poorly informed."
She particularly takes issue with the use of "Frankenstein foods" to describe genetically modified foods, warning "... allowing developing new technologies to be hijacked by phrases which are all to do with headline-grabbing and nothing to do with reality."
Glove's campaign to streamline the debate about genetically modified foods requires the support of the entire scientific community. The GM debate is crying for dignity, and the only people to instill it are scientists.
James Wachai is a communication expert, specializing in agricultural issues, and also authors GMO Africa Blog. On the web at http://www.gmoafrica.org
Sadly, this has not been the case with genetically modified foods. Scientists, for reasons only known to them, have taken a backseat in this debate. Anti-technology activists, most of whom lack the scantiest knowledge of biology, have taken it upon themselves to rubbish crop genetic engineering.
Armed with what I consider "bootleg scientific evidence", these activists want the world to believe that genetically modified foods are poisonous concoctions. In essence, they seek to challenge crop genetic engineering and its potential applications in agriculture.
As anti-biotech rhetoric fills the air, questions are being asked whether scientists are doing enough to defend their work. They aren't. Most seem to be at home expressing their thoughts in peer-reviewed journals, and hard-to-decipher textbooks. All these are out of reach of the general public, the critical constituent in the debate about genetically modified foods.
Scientists all over the world, come out in the open and defend your innovations! Those, especially, working in the area of genomics must move from their cocoon of silence and indifference. The current situation where anti-technology activists continue to recklessly mislead the world about genetically modified foods is unacceptable.
Scientists have left the work of defending genetically modified foods to public relations practitioners and marketing agents. These people least understand the science behind genetically modified foods, and shouldn't be expected to defend it the way scientists would do. Were scientists to shed off their white lab coats and confront anti-technology activists, the debate about genetically modified foods would take a totally different shape.
Perhaps, they can borrow a leaf from Scotland's new chief scientific adviser, Professor Anne Glover. Since her appointment, Glover has vigorously defended genetically modified foods. Hers has not been the usual balderdash about genetically modified foods. All Prof. Glove's arguments are well anchored in science.
Speaking to The Sunday Herald recently, Glover heralded genetically modified foods as an effective tool to fight poverty, hunger and toxic pollution.
A molecular biologist from the University of Aberdeen, Glover lamented that the public debate about genetically modified foods has been "really poorly informed."
She particularly takes issue with the use of "Frankenstein foods" to describe genetically modified foods, warning "... allowing developing new technologies to be hijacked by phrases which are all to do with headline-grabbing and nothing to do with reality."
Glove's campaign to streamline the debate about genetically modified foods requires the support of the entire scientific community. The GM debate is crying for dignity, and the only people to instill it are scientists.
James Wachai is a communication expert, specializing in agricultural issues, and also authors GMO Africa Blog. On the web at http://www.gmoafrica.org
Related Tags: food, benefits, biotechnology, agriculture, scientists, gmos
Your Article Search Directory : Find in Articles
Recent articles in this category:
- Developing A Brand Strategy With Your Blog
If you are blogging to make money it is important to have some type of brand strategy on your site. - 5 Tips To Make Blogging Easy
Many bloggers find it difficult to blog regularly. On the other hand, other bloggers find it easy to - Blogging For Cash: Guest Posting
A free and effective way to bring new readers to your blog is guest posting on other blogs. A guest - How To Increase Blog Profits In No Time
Blogging is all the rage these days, and you have probably heard of the big bucks some bloggers clai - Business And Blogs: A Unique Way To Boost Profits
Business website is definitely an incredible on the internet marketing tool that helps you to save y - Real Addiction Story Blog - Ryan Donnelly's Story
It seems as though everywhere I look today, I hear about addiction. It seems to pop up in many aspec - How To Find Reputable Online Psychics Now
Today, more people are turning to online psychics in search of what the future might hold. Also know - Blogging: Free Online Marketing Method
Blogging has been practiced by lots of individuals for many years. Nevertheless it's just recently t - Making Profits From Your Blog
Possibly the most successful techniques of creating advertising profits for your blog page is by ren - Do You Need No Limited Bandwidth?
Bandwidth procedures the amount of databases transmitted over an internet connection. You have to un
Most viewed articles in this category:
- 8 types of Companies that really benefit from having a Business Blog
While most businesses could benefit from using a Business Blog as part of their marketing and busine - Starting a Business Blog - Remember the Planning Stage
When you start to put a Business Blog together, there is one aspect which is often overlooked in the - Silicon Solar Inc Offers SHURflo Pumps for Large Applications
Silicon Solar Inc, a world leader in innovative solar technologies has just launched a line or la - Free WordPress Blogs and Adsense - A Money Maker for Anyone Who Can Type
If you own a blog that you update frequently; there is an easy way for you to monetize it and start - Podcasting From Small Town Receives Big Attention
Whatever the subject matter may be, podcasting has empowered the masses. With more than 24,000 podca - How To Get Your BLOGS Site Feed Listed In Yahoo! and MSN Within HOURS
BLOGS... they seem to be the talk of the Internet marketing world these days, and for good reason.No - Blogs: The Hidden Ace Up Your Sleeve
If it wasn't for my blog, I wouldn't make any online sales at all.It's true that I have a "regu - Using Social Bookmarking Buttons Easily For Massive Traffic Benifits
Blogs are amazing and that's been stated and proved over and over again. You can go to www.texlinkad - User-Generated Content
This review examines what impact web 2.0 type user generated content will have on business, providin - Blogging and Accountability
A keyboard, a blog and half a dozen whiskeys. It's a recipe for disaster for many bloggers in relati