The Constitutional Value of Sovereignty
- Date: 2010-01-26 - Word Count: 517
Share This!
The constitutional value that is most under threat is, of course, sovereignty itself. Sovereignty is being weakened as the forces of globalization ensure that forces outside the walls of the state fundamentally affect, and sometimes determine, what goes on within them.
Sovereignty and the consequential ban on intervention are also being undermined normatively. As an essentially Westphalia construct, modem ideas of sovereignty predate the Enlightenment by one hundred years. The greatest threat to sovereignty and the associated stigma attached to intervention lies in the full implementation of Enlightenment values.
There were many reasons for this limited role of Enlightenment values in international law. Initially, democratic nations sought the protection of sovereignty against autocratic states that might intervene to crush their fledgling democracies. Their inclination was to keep domestic political values out of international law lest the major views of other states (for example, in favor of monarchies) might be imposed on them. Democrats were only too aware that the French Revolution and the revolutions of 1848 were defeated by autocrats allied to the regimes which the new democracies had ousted.
With the notable exception of US interventions in the Americas, virtually all interventions during this century have been by autocratic states -and the enlightenment credentials of most US interventions in the Americas were dubious, to say the least. It is only recently that the majority of nation states came to enjoy any real measure of democracy and it becomes possible to think of international law being reflective of liberal democratic ideals.
The glaring inconsistency between the bases of constitutional legitimacy in domestic and international law has been sustained by a number of factors:
1. The idea that international law is a law for all states, of which not all are democracies.
2. Cultural relativist notions that different cultures have different approaches to governance.
3. The understanding that it is necessary to 'do business' in both commercial and political terms with a particular territory and that the only way to do this is through the group which exercises effective power in that territory.
4. The idea that there is no alternative to political authority based on the prior successful use of force in a state where there has never been a democratic government which can speak for the people. Even where a democratic government is ousted, it may not be able to retain the integrity of its representative principles for long (as it becomes difficult to collect all elected representatives in one place and it is impossible to conduct new elections).
5. The regretful history of interventions. Nations will rarely intervene solely for the benefit of the citizens of another nation state. They will only do so if it is in their interests. The danger is that nations will intervene to further their interests on the pretext of helping the citizens of the target state, but their 'assistance' will actually work to the detriment of those citizens.
Intervening nations generally intervene in the name of international law but are rarely willing to subject themselves to it. For all these reasons, liberal democrats are traditionally wary of interventions and skeptical of their ability to achieve further liberal democratic values.
Sovereignty and the consequential ban on intervention are also being undermined normatively. As an essentially Westphalia construct, modem ideas of sovereignty predate the Enlightenment by one hundred years. The greatest threat to sovereignty and the associated stigma attached to intervention lies in the full implementation of Enlightenment values.
There were many reasons for this limited role of Enlightenment values in international law. Initially, democratic nations sought the protection of sovereignty against autocratic states that might intervene to crush their fledgling democracies. Their inclination was to keep domestic political values out of international law lest the major views of other states (for example, in favor of monarchies) might be imposed on them. Democrats were only too aware that the French Revolution and the revolutions of 1848 were defeated by autocrats allied to the regimes which the new democracies had ousted.
With the notable exception of US interventions in the Americas, virtually all interventions during this century have been by autocratic states -and the enlightenment credentials of most US interventions in the Americas were dubious, to say the least. It is only recently that the majority of nation states came to enjoy any real measure of democracy and it becomes possible to think of international law being reflective of liberal democratic ideals.
The glaring inconsistency between the bases of constitutional legitimacy in domestic and international law has been sustained by a number of factors:
1. The idea that international law is a law for all states, of which not all are democracies.
2. Cultural relativist notions that different cultures have different approaches to governance.
3. The understanding that it is necessary to 'do business' in both commercial and political terms with a particular territory and that the only way to do this is through the group which exercises effective power in that territory.
4. The idea that there is no alternative to political authority based on the prior successful use of force in a state where there has never been a democratic government which can speak for the people. Even where a democratic government is ousted, it may not be able to retain the integrity of its representative principles for long (as it becomes difficult to collect all elected representatives in one place and it is impossible to conduct new elections).
5. The regretful history of interventions. Nations will rarely intervene solely for the benefit of the citizens of another nation state. They will only do so if it is in their interests. The danger is that nations will intervene to further their interests on the pretext of helping the citizens of the target state, but their 'assistance' will actually work to the detriment of those citizens.
Intervening nations generally intervene in the name of international law but are rarely willing to subject themselves to it. For all these reasons, liberal democrats are traditionally wary of interventions and skeptical of their ability to achieve further liberal democratic values.
Visit the sites of Artur Victoria http://sites.google.com/site/cliptheschoolbeginning/ http://sites.google.com/site/arturvictoriasite/n
n Your Article Search Directory : Find in Articles
Recent articles in this category:
- Third Term - The Obasanjo Syndrome ... Ambition and the Place of God
I recently read a post in a blog (multibrand.blogspot.com) concerning President SBY of Indonesia amb - Black Veterans Still Not Receiving Their Due
With a Black President, many discussions have been re-kindled regarding the treatment of Blacks in v - Are Green Party Candidates Converting Voters?
Have you noticed that the Green Party Convention is hosting a few training sessions which include th - The National Debt: Young Americans Are Inheriting a Sinking Ship
The greatest fundamental weakness of the United States of America is its national debt. Debt weighs - America Must Return to Its Free Market Roots
The United States is the most prosperous country in the world. Its economy has been a constant engin - Policies Of President Obama And Democratic Congress Severely Undermine Job Opportunities For Young Americans
For Young Americans, this is the worst job market in decades. Despite politicians claiming we are on - The Virtues Of A Limited Federal Government And Why America Must Return To The Limited Federal Republic Laid Out In The Constitution
I consider the foundation of the Constitution . . . that 'all powers not delegated to the United Sta - Young Americans Have Largest Stake In Maintaining A Strong Military And Effective Homeland Security Policies
Americans are truly blessed to live in a country protected by the most powerful and effective milita - Why Hitler Wanted To Ban Guns
Whenever the name Adolf Hitler is mentioned one automatically makes a connection to the Holocaust, N - What Happened To The Mohave County Downwinders?
I always get a bit frustrated when I hear that the reason Mohave County was excluded from the Radiat
Most viewed articles in this category:
- Designer Shoes Come First In Global Poll Of Most Wanted Accessories
For both men and women, shoes have long been an essential fashion item. In fact, many women in popul - New US Ambassador for Indonesia Named
The US government has appointed Cameron R. Hume as the next ambassador to Indonesia, reliable source - 1984 By George Orwell
1984 by George Orwell In the book "1984" Orwell criticizes totalitarianism of all types and brings - Chaos Theory: Bush's delusions & Iraq's destiny (Part 2)
The classic counter-insurgency strategy of the US consists of the "ink-blotch" approach. This involv - Will Israel Attack Iran (Part 2)
In November of last year, I wrote an article speculating about whether or not the Israelis would tak - Rodrigues Island 'autonomy'
Rodrigues Island: 'Autonomy' The first few pages were qui - Obama Is Coming, Clear The Way!
"Obama biro, yawne yo!" (Obama is coming, clear the way)—Tens of thousands of cheering Luo "Tr - African Tribes
African Tribes In this article the economies and lifestyles of such African tribes as the Lele and - This Is Not Your Dad's Republican Party Anymore
Stock markets are strange because they reflect the sum total of all our hopes, fears and prejudices - How to Drastically Reduce our Foreign Oil Dependency While Saving you Money at the Pump
If you watch or listen to the news, discussions come up all the time about the price of a barrel of