The Intellectual Property Audit - Finding What You Have (Part II of V)
- Date: 2007-05-21 - Word Count: 962
Share This!
One traditional definition of an intellectual property audit is "a cataloging of a organization's intellectual property assets." It is required for an organization to meet its due-diligence requirements for mergers, acquisitions, or other transfers. Today, organizations see an intellectual property audit not only as a balance sheet for intangible assets but also, more importantly, as a self-evaluation that the organization constantly and consistently engages in to determine the value of its own assets, determine how to best capitalize on those assets, and keep abreast of the changing values of its assets in the face of the ever-changing economic and legal ecosphere.
Who Should Conduct an Intellectual Property Audit?
"Intellectual property audit" is perhaps something of a misnomer. It indicates that the audit is a mere counting up of assets, and the person conducting the audit merely adds up the intellectual property found in the organization and reports the value. Nothing could be further from the truth. An intellectual property audit is an inherently legal undertaking , and should therefore be performed by a team consisting of at least an attorney with expertise in the law of intellectual property, either in-house or outside counsel, or by the in-house personnel of the organization, if they have sufficient knowledge of the organization's intellectual property to perform the activities required for an intellectual property audit of the organization. An intellectual property audit is not an accounting function. The intellectual property audit is an assessment of the legal status and value of an organization's intellectual property, especially targeting those areas where the marketing and management goals of the organization and the existing protection of the organization's intellectual property are somehow not well suited to each other. The attorney or attorneys and other team members (the team might consist of the intellectual property attorney and at least one representative from each of the management, marketing and technology areas ; because of the inherent legal significance of the intellectual property audit, at least one member of the team must be an intellectual property attorney) selected to perform the audit should therefore have some expertise with the organization's technology, the marketing and management goals of the organization, and have some familiarity with what is involved in intellectual property protection: prosecution of the registration application, maintenance of the property, and on through defense of the intellectual property through litigation and the appellate process.
When to Conduct an Intellectual Property Audit
When should an organization consider conducting an intellectual property audit? Attorney Leslie J. Lott has identified several appropriate times in the life of an organization for intellectual property audits ; in this subsection, I borrow heavily from her listing and commentary.
New Intellectual Property Management
If the organization has new intellectual property management, the new intellectual property manager should have a thorough intellectual property audit performed to become familiar with the status of the portfolio.
Merger, Acquisition, Significant Stock Purchase
A significant corporate change (merger, acquisition, significant stock purchase) can impact intellectual property ownership; this is another signal for an intellectual property audit.
Transfer or Assignment of Interest in Intellectual Property
A transfer or assignment of intellectual property from one organization to another calls for an intellectual property audit of both organizations' intellectual property. Here, the intellectual property audit allows the organizations to be sure the transfer or assignment meets the interests of both by ensuring that the intellectual property is properly protected and enhances the acquiring organization's existing intellectual property interests, and that the intellectual property does not leave any unplanned vulnerabilities for the organization transferring the interests.
Licensing Program
An intellectual property audit should be performed when an organization sets up an intellectual property license or licensing program, and on a regular basis thereafter. This is important whether the organization is the licensor or the licensee.
If the organization licenses its intellectual property to others, it must of course actually own the intellectual property that it is licensing. Also, there must be no existing licenses that would interfere with the proposed new license. If the organization is the licensee, obtaining the intellectual property rights of another, the audit determines that the scope and extent of the license to be obtained is adequate for its purposes.
Significant Change in Law
A significant change in case or statutory law may require an organization to re-evaluate its intellectual property. One such change in statutory law occurred when Congress passed the federal anti-dilution statute. This change in the law significantly impacts the analysis of the potential liability of an organization for infringement of the trademarks of others and also affects the analysis of whether or not others are infringing the organization's rights.
Four examples of case law which arouse the need for an intellectual property audit are the Qualitex case (which deals with the protection of color as a trademark), the Sony case (which deals with the question of whether a device that can be used for copyright infringement is itself an infringement of copyright), the Festo case (which deals with the Doctrine of Equivalents in patent prosecution), and the KSR case (which deals with the concept of obviousness in patent law).
Financial Transactions Involving Intellectual Property
Financial transactions involving intellectual property might include loans, public offerings, private placements, or any other transaction which directly involves an organization's intellectual property, or in which the intellectual property of the organization is or could be significant.
New Client Program or Policy
An organization should conduct an intellectual property audit in connection with new programs or policies, such as an aggressive foreign filing program, new marketing approach or direction, expansion of a product line or services, corporate reorganization, or any other corporate change that could affect the interaction between the organization's intellectual property and the marketplace.
Continued in Part III.
Copyright 2003, 2007, Nancy Baum Delain. All rights reserved.
Who Should Conduct an Intellectual Property Audit?
"Intellectual property audit" is perhaps something of a misnomer. It indicates that the audit is a mere counting up of assets, and the person conducting the audit merely adds up the intellectual property found in the organization and reports the value. Nothing could be further from the truth. An intellectual property audit is an inherently legal undertaking , and should therefore be performed by a team consisting of at least an attorney with expertise in the law of intellectual property, either in-house or outside counsel, or by the in-house personnel of the organization, if they have sufficient knowledge of the organization's intellectual property to perform the activities required for an intellectual property audit of the organization. An intellectual property audit is not an accounting function. The intellectual property audit is an assessment of the legal status and value of an organization's intellectual property, especially targeting those areas where the marketing and management goals of the organization and the existing protection of the organization's intellectual property are somehow not well suited to each other. The attorney or attorneys and other team members (the team might consist of the intellectual property attorney and at least one representative from each of the management, marketing and technology areas ; because of the inherent legal significance of the intellectual property audit, at least one member of the team must be an intellectual property attorney) selected to perform the audit should therefore have some expertise with the organization's technology, the marketing and management goals of the organization, and have some familiarity with what is involved in intellectual property protection: prosecution of the registration application, maintenance of the property, and on through defense of the intellectual property through litigation and the appellate process.
When to Conduct an Intellectual Property Audit
When should an organization consider conducting an intellectual property audit? Attorney Leslie J. Lott has identified several appropriate times in the life of an organization for intellectual property audits ; in this subsection, I borrow heavily from her listing and commentary.
New Intellectual Property Management
If the organization has new intellectual property management, the new intellectual property manager should have a thorough intellectual property audit performed to become familiar with the status of the portfolio.
Merger, Acquisition, Significant Stock Purchase
A significant corporate change (merger, acquisition, significant stock purchase) can impact intellectual property ownership; this is another signal for an intellectual property audit.
Transfer or Assignment of Interest in Intellectual Property
A transfer or assignment of intellectual property from one organization to another calls for an intellectual property audit of both organizations' intellectual property. Here, the intellectual property audit allows the organizations to be sure the transfer or assignment meets the interests of both by ensuring that the intellectual property is properly protected and enhances the acquiring organization's existing intellectual property interests, and that the intellectual property does not leave any unplanned vulnerabilities for the organization transferring the interests.
Licensing Program
An intellectual property audit should be performed when an organization sets up an intellectual property license or licensing program, and on a regular basis thereafter. This is important whether the organization is the licensor or the licensee.
If the organization licenses its intellectual property to others, it must of course actually own the intellectual property that it is licensing. Also, there must be no existing licenses that would interfere with the proposed new license. If the organization is the licensee, obtaining the intellectual property rights of another, the audit determines that the scope and extent of the license to be obtained is adequate for its purposes.
Significant Change in Law
A significant change in case or statutory law may require an organization to re-evaluate its intellectual property. One such change in statutory law occurred when Congress passed the federal anti-dilution statute. This change in the law significantly impacts the analysis of the potential liability of an organization for infringement of the trademarks of others and also affects the analysis of whether or not others are infringing the organization's rights.
Four examples of case law which arouse the need for an intellectual property audit are the Qualitex case (which deals with the protection of color as a trademark), the Sony case (which deals with the question of whether a device that can be used for copyright infringement is itself an infringement of copyright), the Festo case (which deals with the Doctrine of Equivalents in patent prosecution), and the KSR case (which deals with the concept of obviousness in patent law).
Financial Transactions Involving Intellectual Property
Financial transactions involving intellectual property might include loans, public offerings, private placements, or any other transaction which directly involves an organization's intellectual property, or in which the intellectual property of the organization is or could be significant.
New Client Program or Policy
An organization should conduct an intellectual property audit in connection with new programs or policies, such as an aggressive foreign filing program, new marketing approach or direction, expansion of a product line or services, corporate reorganization, or any other corporate change that could affect the interaction between the organization's intellectual property and the marketplace.
Continued in Part III.
Copyright 2003, 2007, Nancy Baum Delain. All rights reserved.
Related Tags: intellectual property audit, ip audit
Nancy Baum Delain, a registered patent attorney, is the managing member of Delain Law Office, PLLC, an intellectual property and business law firm located in Clifton Park, NY. Nancy's expertise lies in patent, trademark and copyright prosecution, contract, licensing, and general business matters. She answers her own phone. Find out more at http://www.ipattorneyfirm.com
Your Article Search Directory : Find in ArticlesRecent articles in this category:
- A Los Angeles and Palm Springs California Modeling Lawyer Looks at Modeling Contracts and Advises How Models Can Protect Themselves
Models from Los Angeles to New York have a number of common questions when they first enter the mod - Palm Springs, Newport Beach and Malibu California Publicity and Privacy Rights Lawyer on the Right to Control the Use of Your Image and Likeness
Whether you are a star in the California entertainment industry in Hollywood, Malibu, Los Angeles, - A La Jolla, Irvine, Los Angeles and San Diego Biotechnology Attorney's View of What Biotechnology Can Do for Mankind
If you work in any of the high tech or university medical research areas of Southern California suc - La Quinta, Garden Grove and Corona Del Mar California Copyright Lawyer Looks at Copyright Infringements in Conversations
No matter where you live or try to make a living in Southern California, from Westminster and Missi - Palm Desert, San Diego and Orange County California Intellectual Property Attorney Explains the Worldwide Intellectual Property System
If you are an inventor, a writer, a musician or a designer, it doesn't matter if you live in Murrie - An Orange County, Fullerton and Riverside California Trademark Lawyer's Humorous Take on Trademark Infringement
To a great many people in Southern California, the law regarding infringement of trademarks, copyri - The Marketing of Candidates Using Trademarks and Campaign Slogans in California and the U.s
No matter where you live in America, whether it is in Orange County, California, Los Angeles, CA, S - Trademark of Slogans and Phrases by Palm Springs, San Diego and Orange County California Trademark Lawyers
Clients who want to trademark a slogan or phrase for their products can come from Santa Ana, Califo - Small Article- Poverty
Poverty. Most of the people in most of the cou - Protecting Your Interests: Using Competitive Intelligence Gathering Techniques at Tradeshows to Safeguard Your Bottom Line
"This looks absolutely amazing!" The attendee was smiling, eyes bright, a wide grin. "If this is
Most viewed articles in this category:
- 5 Ways to Protect Your Idea-for Less than $30
For all of the people out there who can't afford the $5,000 for a patent this book is for you. Even - Selecting Business Names and Intellectual Property Law
Whether a software license agreement is properly constructed for a transaction depends on a range of - Protect Your Creativity
As an entrepreneur, you are undoubtedly blessed with the ability to come up with new ideas for produ - Protecting Your Intellectual Property (IP)
Intellectual Property (IP), in the literal sense, refers to the property of one's intellect or mind. - How "Work For Hire" Laws Protect You When You Hire a Ghostwriter
Some people are interested in jumping on the article marketing bandwagon but lack either the time or - The Difference Between Trade Secrets And Trademarks
Some people get confused between trade secrets and trademarks. A trademark is something that is publ - Digital Millennium Copyright Act DMCA Redefined - Steps to Keep Your Content and Intellectual Proper
As Viacom prepares to square off against Google in its lawsuit over the use of copyrighted material - Understanding Patent Database Behavior For Better Patent Search
Extracting information from huge datasets, based on keyword search is actually a challenging job. Pa - Intellectual Property - Copyright Infringement - Trade Mark Infringement
The case of KK Sony Computer Entertainment and Another v Pacific Game Technology (Holding) Ltd [2006 - Intellectual Property Law - Copyright Law - Copyright Infringement - Computer Software
The case of Point Solutions Ltd v Focus Business Solutions Ltd and Another [2007], which was heard i