In the book, "Extraordinary Knowing", Dr. Elizabeth Mayer, a psychologist, introduces the idea that we all "Understand" that there is a lot more to and in life than is analyzable with current scientific approaches. Because of this, scientists have a predicament when they are asked to comment or analyze the Paranormal, or the world of Mediums, or those who feel they can see or feel what others in their family are feeling or seeing even though those parties are physically elsewhere.

I am a business consultant, responsible for finding solutions to things that are not yet in existence. I love doing this. While I was reading this book by Dr. Mayer, it came to me that one thing that would help would be a "Bridge" mathematical formula. While on the surface, this seems more like a character in "Alice in Wonderland" who would invent things just because they could, it, in fact is not for that purpose. Mathematicians create math formulas to depict such things as distances to stars and the track of "Extra-terrestrial comets and meteors", and more, down to earth, the likelihood of future storms, stock market changes and the list goes on and on.

A math formula can be created to "Depict" the relationship between things-whether a mathematical vision or approach seems most logical. [I am going to walk 50 feet north, 100 ft to the left and rise and drop and return the same way, OR-- I am going to take out the trash. One explanation depicts a mathematical approach to a common occurrence and one a verbal approach.

Since this study of the Paranormal is "Out of the box thinking", and a box carries a formula of [the perimeter of a square] a[2] + b[2]. IF we then go to a new variable, one not part of a normal math formula, we can try a[2] + b[2] +< 0 + Z, or a square plus less than zero value plus all possibilities. [We can modify this] Finally, we must include the [no offense/blasphemy intended to any church] Jesus Factor. Here is why this "Addition" is critical: for the history of the earth, and since man emerged, we have had a battle of understanding. The churches considered scientific inquiry to be blasphemy.

Sad. We each sell our approaches/beliefs in life, so, it is understandable that they feel Jesus walked on water, cured people of all ailments and brought back some people from "Wherever." Why can't we give that a calculation of G=[+Z]?. [Without the ?]

Thus the formula IDENTIFICATION for apparitions becomes +< 0 + Z + A= [+Z], so we wind up with, as our formula fore apparations: a[2] + b[2] +< 0 + Z +A=[+Z].

Then, a mathematician can take a known environment, such as where within the living room an apparition was seen, such as 8 ft from the E wall, and 12 feet from the S. Wall, and add such a formula as +8 + +12 [the distances away from both walls] -more numbers can be added if desired to compare distances from other parts of the house, or above the street level or from a telephone pole, etc., and then add + < 0 + Z +A=[+Z] or-the apparition was seen at +8 + +12 + < 0 + Z +A=[+Z].

This "Gotta give things a name and also something to stick into a mathematical formula" need now have a formula that can be injected into scientific studies.

The reason we do it this way is that, when the scientist is hired to study something, such as a study of cars passing a spot on the freeway, he would likely create a formula to depict various types of cars, their speed, and how many are known to go past the spot at any particular time, etc. Many things can be determined by using different formuli.

Thus, many different types of Paranormal can be introduced into the world of science since we are offering these phenomenals via a mathematical formula and giving them a specific name.

It is my sincerest desire that more "This wasn't scientific stuff [Thus not explainable] yesterday", perhaps it can now be scientifically explained or discussed with a tad bit more logic and reason.

As a parting gesture, I like to share with my scientific doubting brothers; at one time in history, phones, airplanes, and DNA could not have been explained in scientific terms. In time, mathematical formulas were created to attach to language. Today, we know what we are talking about when we say those three things. Many people have had premonitions, have seen white lights and others, space aliens. To claim that they have not is to say they could not have seen such. I have not been to any star but I can see most through telescopes.

I have only seen pictures of DNA.

Let's presume these phenomena do exist and try to prove it instead of the other way around.

If you get close, but "No tomato", at least you have a formula you can use! [Scientists exclaim that we "Only" use seven [7] percent of our brain. How in the world did they discover that?

While it is accepted that only a small percentage of the brain is used, would that not lead us to "More easily" accept that perhaps in those "Uncharted areas of our brain" allow us to do those things that seem aberrations?

[PS, you may change any part of this formula as it affects or pleases you.]